-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
chore: misc CLI improvements #218
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Note Other AI code review bot(s) detectedCodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review. Warning Rate limit exceeded@ymc9 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 8 minutes and 53 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)Type Other keywords and placeholders
Status, Documentation and Community
|
|
Claude finished @ymc9's task —— View job Code Review Complete ✅Todo List:
📋 Summary of ChangesThis PR introduces three main CLI improvements:
🔍 Code Quality & Best Practices✅ Strengths:
🐛 Potential Issues
🚀 Performance Considerations✅ Good performance aspects:
🔐 Security Concerns✅ No security issues identified:
🧪 Test Coverage
📝 Recommendations
🎯 Overall AssessmentThis is a solid PR with clean, well-structured code improvements. The changes follow good practices and enhance the CLI user experience. The silent mode implementation is particularly well done with proper conditional logic and type safety. Approval recommendation: ✅ Approve with minor suggestions - The code quality is good, no blocking issues were found, and the improvements add value to the CLI experience. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull Request Overview
This pull request introduces miscellaneous CLI improvements to the ZenStack project, including command name simplification, enhanced output control, and development workflow enhancements.
- Simplified CLI command names from
zenstacktozen - Added silent mode option for generate command to suppress non-error output
- Enhanced project initialization with VSCode configuration and improved development workflow
Reviewed Changes
Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| packages/create-zenstack/src/index.ts | Enhanced project initialization with VSCode config creation, updated command names, and improved development workflow |
| packages/cli/src/index.ts | Changed main CLI command name from 'zenstack' to 'zen' and added silent option for generate command |
| packages/cli/src/actions/generate.ts | Implemented silent mode functionality to conditionally suppress spinner and success messages |
Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.
|
Claude finished @ymc9's task —— View job 📋 Code Review Complete ✅Todo List:
📋 Summary of ChangesThis PR introduces three main CLI improvements:
🔍 Code Quality & Best Practices✅ Strengths:
🐛 Potential Issues
🚀 Performance Considerations✅ Good performance aspects:
🔐 Security Concerns✅ No security issues identified:
🧪 Test Coverage
📝 Recommendations
🎯 Overall AssessmentThis is a solid PR with clean, well-structured code improvements. The changes follow good practices and enhance the CLI user experience. The silent mode implementation is particularly well done with proper conditional logic and type safety. Approval recommendation: ✅ Approve with minor suggestions - The code quality is good, no blocking issues were found, and the improvements add value to the CLI experience. ** |
No description provided.