templates

Signed-off-by: Anas Nashif <[email protected]>

Author: nashif

.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/001_bug_report.yml

@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ body:
       options:
         - label: This is a regression.
           required: false
-  - type: textarea
+  - type: textareat
     id: reproduce
     attributes:
       label: Steps to reproduce

.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/002_enhancement.md

@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+name: Enhancement
+description: Submit an Enhancement
+labels: ["Enhancement"]
+type: "Enhancement"
+assignees: []
+body:
+  - type: markdown
+    attributes:
+      value: |
+        Thanks for taking the time to fill out this enhancement proposal.
+  - type: textarea
+    id: description
+    attributes:
+      label: Summary
+      description: |
+        Is your enhancement proposal related to a problem? Please describe.
+      placeholder: |
+        A clear and concise description of what the problem is.
+    validations:
+      required: true
+  - type: textarea
+    id: solution
+    attributes:
+      label: Describe the solution you'd like
+      description: |
+        Describe the solution you'd like
+      placeholder: |
+        A clear and concise description of what you want to happen.
+    validations:
+      required: true
+  - type: textarea
+    id: alternatives
+    attributes:
+      label: Alternatives
+      description: Describe alternatives you've considered
+      placeholder: |
+        A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.
+  - type: textarea
+    id: context
+    attributes:
+      label: Additional Context
+      description: Add any other context or graphics (drag-and-drop an image) about the feature request here.

.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/002_enhancement.yml

@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
+name: RFC / Proposal
+description: Submit a Proposal (RFC)
+labels: ["RFC"]
+type: RFC
+assignees: []
+body:
+  - type: markdown
+    attributes:
+      value: |
+        ## Introduction
+
+        This section targets end users, TSC members, maintainers and anyone else 
+        that might need a quick explanation of your proposed change.
+
+  - type: textarea
+    id: problem-description
+    attributes:
+      label: Problem Description
+      description: Why do we want this change and what problem are we trying to address?
+      placeholder: Explain the problem or limitation this RFC is meant to resolve.
+    validations:
+      required: true
+
+  - type: textarea
+    id: proposed-change-summary
+    attributes:
+      label: Proposed Change (Summary)
+      description: A high-level summary of the proposed change (the 10,000 ft view).
+      placeholder: Brief summary of what will change if this RFC is implemented.
+    validations:
+      required: true
+
+  - type: markdown
+    attributes:
+      value: |
+        ## Detailed RFC
+
+        This section targets the development team. Upon reading it, each engineer 
+        should understand what must be done to implement the proposed feature.
+
+  - type: textarea
+    id: detailed-change
+    attributes:
+      label: Proposed Change (Detailed)
+      description: Describe the change in as much detail as possible. Include context or background info, and reuse of existing components if applicable.
+      placeholder: Explain exactly what you’re planning to change and how.
+    validations:
+      required: true
+
+  - type: textarea
+    id: dependencies
+    attributes:
+      label: Dependencies
+      description: Highlight how this change may affect the rest of the project or other teams/components.
+      placeholder: List components, modules, or teams affected.
+    validations:
+      required: false
+
+  - type: textarea
+    id: concerns
+    attributes:
+      label: Concerns and Unresolved Questions
+      description: List any concerns, unknowns, or unresolved questions related to this proposal.
+      placeholder: Any areas of uncertainty?
+    validations:
+      required: false
+
+  - type: textarea
+    id: alternatives
+    attributes:
+      label: Alternatives Considered
+      description: What alternative solutions were considered? Why was this proposal chosen?
+      placeholder: List alternatives and explain the rationale behind your choice.
+    validations:
+      required: false
+