Commit eadc3d0
twister: Fix inconsistency among DT compat filters
This small change concerns the following filter functions:
1. `dt_compat_enabled(C)`:
There's a node with compatible `C` and status "okay".
2. `dt_enabled_alias_with_parent_compat(A, C)`:
There's a node with alias `A` and status "okay", and its parent
has compatible `C`.
3. `dt_label_with_parent_compat_enabled(L, C)`:
There's a node with label `L`, and its parent has compatible `C`
and status "okay".
All three functions involve checking whether some node or its parent has
a given compatible, but the way this has been checked is inconsistent.
Function (1) has done it with this Python conditional:
compat in node.compats
while (2) and (3) have used:
parent.matching_compat == compat
The first check works well with nodes that have multiple compatibles,
and it is more aligned with the notion of "has_compat" as seen in the
devicetree macros for C, CMake, and Kconfig.
Arguably, `matching_compat` shouldn't have been used here, because it is
actually a property of a node's binding, moreso than of the node itself.
In practice, it's usually equal to the first compatible for which edtlib
has found a binding, which at first glance is just more constrained than
the `node.compats` check. However, there also exist obscure cases where
the `node.compats` are empty, while the `node.matching_compat` is not.
For now, the three functions can use a combined check, to improve
consistency and utility while avoiding breakage:
node.matching_compat == compat or compat in node.compats
Signed-off-by: Grzegorz Swiderski <[email protected]>1 parent 89bf698 commit eadc3d0
1 file changed
+5
-3
lines changed| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
227 | 227 | | |
228 | 228 | | |
229 | 229 | | |
230 | | - | |
| 230 | + | |
231 | 231 | | |
232 | 232 | | |
233 | 233 | | |
| |||
247 | 247 | | |
248 | 248 | | |
249 | 249 | | |
250 | | - | |
| 250 | + | |
| 251 | + | |
251 | 252 | | |
252 | 253 | | |
253 | 254 | | |
| |||
258 | 259 | | |
259 | 260 | | |
260 | 261 | | |
261 | | - | |
| 262 | + | |
| 263 | + | |
262 | 264 | | |
263 | 265 | | |
264 | 266 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments