You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Update the conformance list and doc generation logic
The existing walk.go and conformance.txt have a few shortcomings
which we'd like to resolve:
- difficult to get the full test name due to test context nesting
- complicated AST logic and understanding necessary due to the
different ways a test can be invoked and written
This changes the AST parsing logic to be much more simple and simply
looks for the comments at/around a specific line. This file/line
information (and the full test name) is gathered by a custom ginkgo
reporter which dumps the SpecSummary data to a file.
Also, the SpecSummary dump can, itself, be potentially useful for
other post-processing and debugging tasks.
Signed-off-by: John Schnake <[email protected]>
being executed in a pod MUST be sent to the pod's logs.
37
-
Note this test needs to be fixed to also test for stderr
32
+
- Added to conformance in release v1.13
33
+
- Defined in code as: [k8s.io] Kubelet when scheduling a busybox command in a pod should print the output to logs [NodeConformance][Conformance]
34
+
35
+
By default the stdout and stderr from the process being executed in a pod MUST be sent to the pod's logs.
38
36
39
37
Notational Conventions when documenting the tests with the key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" are to be interpreted as described in [RFC 2119](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2119).
0 commit comments