This document provides a comprehensive comparison between the AWS ECS and AWS EKS implementations in this project, helping you understand the trade-offs between these two container orchestration approaches.
ECS:
- AWS-proprietary container orchestration
- Task definitions define containers
- ECS service manages desired count
- Tightly integrated with AWS services
EKS:
- Standard Kubernetes (K8s) orchestration
- Deployments + Pods define containers
- ReplicaSets manage desired count
- Portable across clouds (AWS, GCP, Azure, on-prem)
ECS:
- ECS tasks use ENIs (awsvpc mode)
- ALB target groups register tasks directly
- Security groups on tasks
EKS:
- Pods use AWS VPC CNI for IP addresses
- ALB Ingress Controller creates target groups
- Security groups on nodes + network policies
ECS:
- ECS Capacity Provider scales EC2 instances
- ECS Service Auto Scaling scales tasks
- Target tracking based on CPU/memory
EKS:
- Cluster Autoscaler scales nodes
- Horizontal Pod Autoscaler (HPA) scales pods
- Metrics Server provides resource metrics
ECS:
- AWS Cloud Map for service discovery
- ALB for external load balancing
- ECS service connects to target groups
EKS:
- Kubernetes DNS (CoreDNS) for service discovery
- AWS Load Balancer Controller for external LB
- Ingress resources create ALBs automatically
ECS:
- Task Role: IAM role for application
- Execution Role: IAM role for ECS agent
- Directly attached to task definition
EKS:
- ServiceAccount: Kubernetes identity for pods
- IRSA (IAM Roles for Service Accounts): Maps K8s SA to IAM role
- Annotated on ServiceAccount
| ECS Component | EKS Equivalent | Description |
|---|---|---|
| ECS Cluster | EKS Cluster | Control plane for container orchestration |
| ECS EC2 Launch Template + ASG | EKS Node Group | Managed EC2 instances running Kubernetes |
| ECS Task Definition | Kubernetes Deployment | Application container specifications |
| ECS Service | Kubernetes Service + Ingress | Load balancing and service discovery |
| ALB Target Group | AWS Load Balancer Controller | Ingress controller managing ALB |
| ECS Task Role | Kubernetes ServiceAccount + IRSA | Pod-level IAM permissions |
| Aspect | ECS (infra-ecs/) | EKS (infra-eks/) |
|---|---|---|
| Orchestration | AWS ECS (proprietary) | Kubernetes (open-source) |
| Control Plane | Free, managed by AWS ECS | Not free, managed by AWS EKS |
| Total Monthly Cost | Cheap (x) |
Expensive (2x) |
| Learning Curve | Easier | Steeper |
| Complexity | Lower | Higher |
| Portability | AWS-only | Multi-cloud |
| Ecosystem | AWS services | Kubernetes ecosystem |
| Load Balancing | ALB managed by Terraform | ALB managed by Ingress Controller |
| Scaling | ECS Service auto-scaling + Capacity Provider | Horizontal Pod Autoscaler (HPA) + Cluster Autoscaler |
| Workload Definition | Task Definition + Service | Deployment + Service + Ingress |
| Networking | awsvpc mode with ENI per task | Kubernetes CNI (AWS VPC CNI) |
| Use Case | AWS-committed workloads | Kubernetes-native or multi-cloud |
Yes! The implementations use separate Terraform state files (deployment/ vs deployment/app/) and independent resources, allowing side-by-side deployment for comparison.
This allows you to:
- Compare performance and behavior between ECS and EKS
- Test migration strategies
- Evaluate which approach better fits your use case
- Learn both orchestration platforms hands-on
Related Documentation:
Last Updated: 2026-01-09