|
| 1 | +/* |
| 2 | + * Copyright (c) 2025 TESOBE |
| 3 | + * |
| 4 | + * This file is part of OBP-OIDC. |
| 5 | + * |
| 6 | + * OBP-OIDC is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify |
| 7 | + * it under the terms of the GNU Affero General Public License as published by |
| 8 | + * the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or |
| 9 | + * (at your option) any later version. |
| 10 | + * |
| 11 | + * OBP-OIDC is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, |
| 12 | + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of |
| 13 | + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the |
| 14 | + * GNU Affero General Public License for more details. |
| 15 | + * |
| 16 | + * You should have received a copy of the GNU Affero General Public License |
| 17 | + * along with OBP-OIDC. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. |
| 18 | + */ |
| 19 | + |
| 20 | +package com.tesobe.oidc.endpoints |
| 21 | + |
| 22 | +import cats.effect.IO |
| 23 | + |
| 24 | +import com.tesobe.oidc.auth.DatabaseAuthService |
| 25 | +import com.tesobe.oidc.config.OidcConfig |
| 26 | +import com.tesobe.oidc.revocation.TokenRevocationService |
| 27 | +import org.http4s._ |
| 28 | +import org.http4s.dsl.io._ |
| 29 | +import org.http4s.headers.Authorization |
| 30 | +import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory |
| 31 | + |
| 32 | +import java.util.Base64 |
| 33 | + |
| 34 | +/** Token Revocation Endpoint (RFC 7009) |
| 35 | + * |
| 36 | + * This endpoint allows clients to notify the authorization server that a |
| 37 | + * previously obtained refresh or access token is no longer needed. This allows |
| 38 | + * the authorization server to clean up security credentials. |
| 39 | + * |
| 40 | + * Key features: |
| 41 | + * - Accepts both access tokens and refresh tokens |
| 42 | + * - Supports client authentication via Basic Auth or POST body |
| 43 | + * - Always returns 200 OK (even for invalid tokens, per RFC 7009) |
| 44 | + * - Optional token_type_hint parameter to optimize lookup |
| 45 | + */ |
| 46 | +class RevocationEndpoint( |
| 47 | + authService: DatabaseAuthService, |
| 48 | + revocationService: TokenRevocationService[IO], |
| 49 | + config: OidcConfig |
| 50 | +) { |
| 51 | + |
| 52 | + private val logger = LoggerFactory.getLogger(getClass) |
| 53 | + |
| 54 | + val routes: HttpRoutes[IO] = HttpRoutes.of[IO] { |
| 55 | + case req @ POST -> Root / "obp-oidc" / "revoke" => |
| 56 | + handleRevocationRequest(req) |
| 57 | + } |
| 58 | + |
| 59 | + /** Extract Basic Auth credentials from Authorization header |
| 60 | + * |
| 61 | + * @param req |
| 62 | + * HTTP request |
| 63 | + * @return |
| 64 | + * Option of (clientId, clientSecret) |
| 65 | + */ |
| 66 | + private def extractBasicAuthCredentials( |
| 67 | + req: Request[IO] |
| 68 | + ): Option[(String, String)] = { |
| 69 | + req.headers.get[Authorization].flatMap { auth => |
| 70 | + auth.credentials match { |
| 71 | + case org.http4s.Credentials.Token(scheme, token) |
| 72 | + if scheme == org.http4s.AuthScheme.Basic => |
| 73 | + val encoded = token |
| 74 | + try { |
| 75 | + val decoded = new String( |
| 76 | + Base64.getDecoder.decode(encoded), |
| 77 | + "UTF-8" |
| 78 | + ) |
| 79 | + decoded.split(":", 2) match { |
| 80 | + case Array(clientId, clientSecret) => |
| 81 | + Some((clientId, clientSecret)) |
| 82 | + case _ => None |
| 83 | + } |
| 84 | + } catch { |
| 85 | + case _: Exception => None |
| 86 | + } |
| 87 | + case _ => None |
| 88 | + } |
| 89 | + } |
| 90 | + } |
| 91 | + |
| 92 | + /** Handle token revocation request according to RFC 7009 |
| 93 | + * |
| 94 | + * RFC 7009 Section 2.2 states: "The authorization server responds with HTTP |
| 95 | + * status code 200 if the token has been revoked successfully or if the |
| 96 | + * client submitted an invalid token." |
| 97 | + * |
| 98 | + * This means we always return 200 OK, even if: |
| 99 | + * - The token is invalid |
| 100 | + * - The token doesn't exist |
| 101 | + * - The client is not authorized |
| 102 | + * |
| 103 | + * This is intentional to prevent token scanning attacks. |
| 104 | + */ |
| 105 | + private def handleRevocationRequest(req: Request[IO]): IO[Response[IO]] = { |
| 106 | + val result = for { |
| 107 | + // Parse form data |
| 108 | + formData <- req.as[UrlForm] |
| 109 | + |
| 110 | + // Extract token (required) |
| 111 | + token = formData.getFirst("token") |
| 112 | + |
| 113 | + // Extract token_type_hint (optional) |
| 114 | + tokenTypeHint = formData.getFirst("token_type_hint") |
| 115 | + |
| 116 | + // Extract client credentials from Basic Auth header |
| 117 | + basicCredentialsOpt = extractBasicAuthCredentials(req) |
| 118 | + clientIdFromBasic = basicCredentialsOpt.map(_._1) |
| 119 | + clientSecretFromBasic = basicCredentialsOpt.map(_._2) |
| 120 | + |
| 121 | + // Extract client credentials from form body (fallback) |
| 122 | + clientIdFromForm = formData.getFirst("client_id") |
| 123 | + clientSecretFromForm = formData.getFirst("client_secret") |
| 124 | + |
| 125 | + // Resolve which credentials to use (Basic Auth takes precedence) |
| 126 | + resolvedClientId = clientIdFromBasic.orElse(clientIdFromForm) |
| 127 | + resolvedClientSecret = clientSecretFromBasic.orElse(clientSecretFromForm) |
| 128 | + |
| 129 | + _ <- IO( |
| 130 | + logger.info( |
| 131 | + s"Revocation request received - client: ${resolvedClientId |
| 132 | + .getOrElse("unknown")}, token_type_hint: ${tokenTypeHint.getOrElse("none")}" |
| 133 | + ) |
| 134 | + ) |
| 135 | + |
| 136 | + // Validate that token parameter is present |
| 137 | + tokenValue <- token match { |
| 138 | + case Some(t) if t.nonEmpty => IO.pure(t) |
| 139 | + case _ => |
| 140 | + // RFC 7009: Missing token parameter returns 400 Bad Request (only error case) |
| 141 | + IO(logger.warn("Revocation request missing 'token' parameter")) |
| 142 | + IO.raiseError( |
| 143 | + new IllegalArgumentException("Missing required parameter: token") |
| 144 | + ) |
| 145 | + } |
| 146 | + |
| 147 | + // Validate client credentials if provided |
| 148 | + // Note: RFC 7009 allows public clients (no authentication), but we require it |
| 149 | + clientValidated <- (resolvedClientId, resolvedClientSecret) match { |
| 150 | + case (Some(clientId), Some(clientSecret)) => |
| 151 | + authService |
| 152 | + .authenticateClient(clientId, clientSecret) |
| 153 | + .flatMap { |
| 154 | + case Right(_) => |
| 155 | + IO(logger.info(s"Client authenticated: $clientId")) |
| 156 | + IO.pure(true) |
| 157 | + case Left(oidcError) => |
| 158 | + IO( |
| 159 | + logger.warn( |
| 160 | + s"Client authentication failed for revocation: ${oidcError.error}" |
| 161 | + ) |
| 162 | + ) |
| 163 | + // Per RFC 7009, we return 200 OK even for auth failures (to prevent token scanning) |
| 164 | + IO.pure(false) |
| 165 | + } |
| 166 | + case (Some(clientId), None) => |
| 167 | + // Client ID provided but no secret - could be public client |
| 168 | + IO( |
| 169 | + logger.warn( |
| 170 | + s"Revocation request with client_id but no client_secret: $clientId" |
| 171 | + ) |
| 172 | + ) |
| 173 | + IO.pure(false) |
| 174 | + case _ => |
| 175 | + // No client credentials provided |
| 176 | + IO(logger.warn("Revocation request with no client credentials")) |
| 177 | + IO.pure(false) |
| 178 | + } |
| 179 | + |
| 180 | + // RFC 7009: Always revoke the token, even if client auth fails |
| 181 | + // This is debatable, but the spec says to return 200 OK regardless |
| 182 | + // We'll only revoke if client is authenticated (more secure) |
| 183 | + _ <- |
| 184 | + if (clientValidated) { |
| 185 | + revocationService |
| 186 | + .revokeToken(tokenValue, tokenTypeHint) |
| 187 | + .flatMap { _ => |
| 188 | + IO( |
| 189 | + logger.info( |
| 190 | + s"Token revoked successfully: ${tokenValue |
| 191 | + .take(8)}... (hint: ${tokenTypeHint.getOrElse("none")})" |
| 192 | + ) |
| 193 | + ) |
| 194 | + } |
| 195 | + } else { |
| 196 | + IO( |
| 197 | + logger.warn( |
| 198 | + "Token revocation skipped due to client authentication failure" |
| 199 | + ) |
| 200 | + ) |
| 201 | + } |
| 202 | + |
| 203 | + // Always return 200 OK per RFC 7009 Section 2.2 |
| 204 | + response <- Ok("") |
| 205 | + |
| 206 | + } yield response |
| 207 | + |
| 208 | + // Handle errors |
| 209 | + result.handleErrorWith { error => |
| 210 | + error match { |
| 211 | + case _: IllegalArgumentException => |
| 212 | + // Missing token parameter - only case where we return 400 |
| 213 | + BadRequest("invalid_request") |
| 214 | + case _ => |
| 215 | + // Any other error - return 200 OK per RFC 7009 |
| 216 | + logger.error( |
| 217 | + s"Error processing revocation request: ${error.getMessage}", |
| 218 | + error |
| 219 | + ) |
| 220 | + Ok("") |
| 221 | + } |
| 222 | + } |
| 223 | + } |
| 224 | +} |
| 225 | + |
| 226 | +object RevocationEndpoint { |
| 227 | + def apply( |
| 228 | + authService: DatabaseAuthService, |
| 229 | + revocationService: TokenRevocationService[IO], |
| 230 | + config: OidcConfig |
| 231 | + ): RevocationEndpoint = new RevocationEndpoint( |
| 232 | + authService, |
| 233 | + revocationService, |
| 234 | + config |
| 235 | + ) |
| 236 | +} |
0 commit comments