Replies: 3 comments
|
This makes sense to me, I don't think we want to release |
0 replies
|
+1 great idea. we dont need to maintain a completely separate crates/package under |
0 replies
|
Seems we reached consensus on it, resolved in #2506 , thanks @kevinjqliu ! |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Currently the python binding, e.g pyiceberg_core is in a standalone workspace, and excludes from root workspace. This cause some troubles for us:
pyiceberg_corecrate.pyiceberg_core, such astokio,datafusion, etc. Due to the possible instability of public apis such as arrow and datafusion, this may cause trouble for us to maintain.We are in fact releasing
pyiceberg_corewith core iceberg crates with same schedule, so I would suggest to movepyiceberg_coreto root workspace.All reactions