You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Kalman 3D Wave using adaptation parameters as control inputs. Estimate uncertainty of control inputs on-line
Mag calibration crashes. Too much stack usage?
Docs: Mention other pseudo measurements for drift correction on real IMU
Docs: Mention GPS timing and uncertainty factors
Docs: Mention adaptation using parameters as control inputs and RW
Docs: Mention timing and FIFO use on real IMU importance
Docs: Cross ref figures with text
Kalman 3D Wave use of temperature correction
Stricter acceleration biases calibration
Docs: Mention alternative double integration method with pos, velocity pseudo measurements. Choice for noisy IMU
Docs: Jacobian in doc for Ih two different formulas are in the document. One is too approximate
Docs: explain why PM results worse
Try to tune better with no noise and no mag first
OU as regularization
De-trend needs on real IMU. Adaptation of de-trending. Tests for de-trend. Discussion.
Oscillatory models introduce "ringing" which looks like fake motion if spectral model is just slightly off. Integrator models have low frequency drifts (looks like fake swell)
Adaptation is very important for different sea states