Skip to content

The ggplot2 argument is linewidth -- should we instead go in the other direction to be consistent with the core plotting framework? #661

The ggplot2 argument is linewidth -- should we instead go in the other direction to be consistent with the core plotting framework?

The ggplot2 argument is linewidth -- should we instead go in the other direction to be consistent with the core plotting framework? #661

Triggered via pull request August 4, 2026 11:37
Status Failure
Total duration 11m 1s
Artifacts

lint-changed-files.yaml

on: pull_request
lint-changed-files  /  lint-changed-files
1m 56s
lint-changed-files / lint-changed-files
Fit to window
Zoom out
Zoom in

Annotations

1 error and 2 warnings
lint-changed-files / lint-changed-files
Process completed with exit code 31.
lint-changed-files / lint-changed-files: R/plot.estimate_density.R#L19
file=R/plot.estimate_density.R,line=19,col=44,[nzchar_linter] Use !nzchar(x) instead of x == "". Note that unlike nzchar(), EQ coerces to character, so you'll have to use as.character() if x is a factor. Whenever missing data is possible, please take care to use nzchar(., keepNA = TRUE); nzchar(NA) is TRUE by default.
lint-changed-files / lint-changed-files: R/plot.check_predictions.R#L301
file=R/plot.check_predictions.R,line=301,col=3,[function_argument_linter] Arguments without defaults should come before arguments with defaults.