- GitHub Actions workflow deploys to Cloudflare R2 CDN on tag pushes
- Deployment uses GitHub Secrets (CLOUDFLARE_API_TOKEN, CLOUDFLARE_ACCOUNT_ID, etc.)
.envfile with credentials is already in.gitignore✓
Best for: Simplicity and transparency
What to do:
- Verify
.envis in.gitignore(already done ✓) - Ensure all secrets are in GitHub Secrets, not hardcoded (already done ✓)
- Make repo public
- Optionally add deployment environment protection (see Option 4)
Pros:
- Simple - single repo to maintain
- GitHub Actions workflow is visible but safe (uses secrets, not credentials)
- Community can see and improve your CI/CD process
- Standard practice for open source projects
Cons:
- Deployment workflow is public (though this is normal for OSS)
Security notes:
- GitHub Secrets are encrypted and never exposed in logs
- Workflow file itself contains no sensitive data
- Even if someone forks your repo, they won't have your secrets
Best for: Keeping deployment logic completely private
What to do:
- Create new private repo:
ezcontactform-widget-deploy - Move
.github/workflows/release.ymlanddeploy-cloudflare.shto private repo - Configure workflow to pull releases from public repo:
- uses: actions/download-artifact@v3 with: github-token: ${{ secrets.PAT_TOKEN }} repository: yourusername/ezcontactform-widget workflow: build.yml
- Make main repo public (without deployment workflows)
Pros:
- Complete separation of concerns
- Deployment process is private
- Can have different access controls
Cons:
- More complex - two repos to manage
- Need Personal Access Token for cross-repo access
- Duplicated effort for maintenance
Best for: Maintaining both public transparency and private deployment
What to do:
- Make current repo public
- Create private fork for your own deployments
- Keep deployment workflows in private fork only
- Pull updates from public repo when needed
Pros:
- Public repo is clean - just source code
- Your deployment stays in a controlled private fork
- Easy to sync changes between repos
Cons:
- Syncing can be manual
- Need to manage two repos
Best for: Adding extra security to Option 1
What to do:
- Create a
productionenvironment in GitHub Settings - Add protection rules:
- Required reviewers
- Restrict to specific branches (tags)
- Move secrets to environment level instead of repo level
- Update workflow to use environment:
jobs: build-and-release: environment: production
Pros:
- Extra layer of protection for production deployments
- Audit trail of who approved deployments
- Can require manual approval before deploy
- Works with public repos
Cons:
- Slightly more complex setup
- May slow down automated deployments if reviewers required
For most users: Option 1 (keep everything in one repo)
Why?
- It's how most open source projects work (React, Vue, etc.)
- Your workflow already follows best practices
- Secrets are properly managed via GitHub Secrets
- Community can learn from and contribute to your deployment strategy
Action items:
- Review
.envis in.gitignore✓ (already done) - Confirm all secrets are in GitHub repo settings
- Optionally set up GitHub Environment for extra protection
- Make repo public
- Update README to document how others can fork and deploy
If you need extra security: Add Option 4 (GitHub Environments)
- Requires manual approval before each deployment
- Good for compliance or regulated industries
✓ .env - Already in .gitignore
✓ .github/workflows/release.yml - Uses secrets, no hardcoded values
✓ deploy-cloudflare.sh - Uses environment variables
README.md- Add section on how to fork and deploy- Check for any TODO comments with internal URLs
- Review commit history for accidentally committed secrets
If you want the simplest approach:
- Make repo public
- Delete
.github/workflows/release.ymlfrom public repo - Deploy manually using
deploy-cloudflare.shlocally - Only you can deploy since only you have the credentials
Pros: Maximum simplicity Cons: No automated deployments, manual releases only