Status of acb_dft

[Joel-Dahne]

The documentation for the acb_dft module has the warning

Warning: the interfaces in this module are experimental and may change without notice.

at the top of the page. The code has at this point not changed for close to a decade. Does it make sense to still mark this as experimental?

The reason that I'm looking into it is that I have been meaning to wrap this code in Arblib.jl. Normally I would hesitate to write a wrapper for experimental code (advanced users can always wrap it themselves), but in this case it seems like the code is not particularly experimental in practice.

[fredrik-johansson]

I think the "Main DFT functions" at least can be considered stable and safe to wrap. If we change the internal algorithms at some point in the future, we will probably at least keep the main DFT functions with the same interface for backwards compatibility.

[Joel-Dahne]

Then I'll take a look at wrapping that one!