This repository was archived by the owner on Jun 26, 2026. It is now read-only.
Recommended workflow to work on phases in parallel? #1422
Answered
by
trek-e
peterjuras
asked this question in
Q&A
|
Hi! I've created the roadmap for a milestone that includes multiple phases and some of them can be worked on independently according to gsd. What is the recommended workflow to work on phases in parallel? I've tried to use the workstreams & workspaces commands, however they feel very heavyweight and like I'm doing something wrong. For example when using workspaces it asks me whether to map the codebase first in the new worktree, but this should not be needed? |
Answered by
trek-e
Apr 1, 2026
Replies: 1 comment
|
v1.31.0 adds several features for parallel phase work:
The recommended flow for independent phases: Generated by Claude Code |
0 replies
Answer selected by
trek-e
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
v1.31.0 adds several features for parallel phase work:
/gsd:autonomous --only N— Execute a single phase, then repeat for another/gsd:workstreams— Namespace isolation for parallel workproject_codeconfig — Prefix phase directories to avoid numbering collisionsworkflow.use_worktrees: false— If worktree conflicts are an issueThe recommended flow for independent phases:
Generated by Claude Code