Skip to content

fix: remove unused Insecure field incorrectly assigned KeycloackEnabl…#452

Open
Priyanshubhartistm wants to merge 1 commit into
microcks:masterfrom
Priyanshubhartistm:fix/remove-insecure-field-incorrect-assignment
Open

fix: remove unused Insecure field incorrectly assigned KeycloackEnabl…#452
Priyanshubhartistm wants to merge 1 commit into
microcks:masterfrom
Priyanshubhartistm:fix/remove-insecure-field-incorrect-assignment

Conversation

@Priyanshubhartistm

@Priyanshubhartistm Priyanshubhartistm commented Jun 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

  • Bug: In pkg/connectors/microcks_client.go, the NewClient function incorrectly assigned configCtx.Server.KeycloakEnable (a boolean flag for Keycloak authentication) to the c.Insecure field (which semantically represents TLS insecurity). This meant that when Keycloak was enabled, c.Insecure was set to true - a completely unrelated concern.
  • Fix: Removed the unused Insecure field from the microcksClient struct and its incorrect assignment (c.Insecure = configCtx.Server.KeycloakEnable) in NewClient.
  • Rationale: The Insecure field was never read anywhere in the codebase after being assigned, making it dead code. The InsecureTLS field already correctly handles TLS skip-verify behavior via configCtx.Server.InsecureTLS, so no functionality is lost.

Related issue(s)

Fixes #434

…e value

The Insecure field in microcksClient was being assigned from
configCtx.Server.KeycloackEnable (a Keycloak auth flag) which is
semantically unrelated to TLS insecurity. Since the Insecure field
was never read anywhere in the codebase after assignment, it was
effectively dead code.

This commit removes both the unused Insecure field from the
microcksClient struct and its incorrect assignment in NewClient.
The InsecureTLS field already correctly handles TLS skip-verify
behavior via configCtx.Server.InsecureTLS.

Fixes microcks#434

Signed-off-by: Priyanshubhartistm <bhartipriyanshustm@gmail.com>
@Priyanshubhartistm Priyanshubhartistm force-pushed the fix/remove-insecure-field-incorrect-assignment branch from d799248 to 2229042 Compare June 6, 2026 09:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Bug: c.Insecure field is incorrectly assigned KeycloackEnable value in NewClient

1 participant