Initialisation takes a long time compared with ORBSLAM2 #557
Unanswered
martinakos
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 3 comments
-
|
Any help with this issue? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
Maybe related #348 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
I would suggest using an example .yaml config from some of the examples and see if any of those work better. e.g. https://github.com/stella-cv/stella_vslam/blob/main/example/euroc/EuRoC_mono.yaml |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I'm running stella_vslam with perspective monocular camera configuration on my own dataset.
ORBSLAM2 can initialise on this dataset very quick.
However, stella_vslam takes a very long time to initialise, if it ever initialises, on the same dataset with same calibration as I use in ORBSLAM2 and same parameters for feature extraction.
The debug logs for stella_vslam keep repeating these sort of messages:
Eventually at some point the initialization succeeds with F.
I wonder if there is any configuration I can change to make stella_vslam initialise as quickly as ORBSLAM2?
Also, in ORBSLAM2 I see the initialisation features being tracked before the first map is created. I can't see that in stella_vslam so I don't know if it's tracking any features at initialisation. Maybe adding that visualisation would be a nice feature for debugging what's happening during initialisation.
This is my configuration file:
and I use the default vocabulary file provided in https://github.com/stella-cv/FBoW_orb_vocab/raw/main/orb_vocab.fbow
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions