Skip to content

Conversation

@Oliver-Loeffler
Copy link

Could fix issue #21
Beside JavaFX/Java versions, I've bumped the version number to 3.2.0.

@Oliver-Loeffler
Copy link
Author

Well, JavaFX 19 runs well with Java 11. Hence I've reverted the Java target version to 11.
Technically a JavaFX 19 based build is still something to be considered as with JLink and JPackage the exclusion of JavaFX 11 dependencies did not yield in a working executable. Need to continue to play around with this.

Also was thinking about versioning. Not sure of incrementing the minor version for that is the right approach. I've observed that for e.g. JDBC drivers the library version often gets a jdkXY or jreXY suffix. Same could help here, e.g. 3.1.0.javafx19 or 3.1.0.fx19. What do you think?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant