-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.9k
feat(runtime): correct typo in variable name #7172
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -354,9 +354,9 @@ func handleParams(create request.RuntimeCreate, projectDir string) (composeConte | |
| if err != nil { | ||
| return | ||
| } | ||
| case constant.RuntimeDoNet: | ||
| case constant.RuntimeDotNet: | ||
| create.Params["CODE_DIR"] = create.CodeDir | ||
| create.Params["DONET_VERSION"] = create.Version | ||
| create.Params["DOTNET_VERSION"] = create.Version | ||
| create.Params["PANEL_APP_PORT_HTTP"] = create.Port | ||
| composeContent, err = handleCompose(env, composeContent, create, projectDir) | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
|
|
@@ -408,7 +408,7 @@ func handleCompose(env gotenv.Env, composeContent []byte, create request.Runtime | |
| ports = append(ports, "${HOST_IP}:${PANEL_APP_PORT_HTTP}:${JAVA_APP_PORT}") | ||
| case constant.RuntimeGo: | ||
| ports = append(ports, "${HOST_IP}:${PANEL_APP_PORT_HTTP}:${GO_APP_PORT}") | ||
| case constant.RuntimePython, constant.RuntimeDoNet: | ||
| case constant.RuntimePython, constant.RuntimeDotNet: | ||
| ports = append(ports, "${HOST_IP}:${PANEL_APP_PORT_HTTP}:${APP_PORT}") | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. It appears that there is no code difference or issue to discuss. The provided code seems to be from a context where it handles parameters when creating Docker containers using various runtime environments (Go, Python, .NET, etc.). Here's what I can gather:
There does not seem to be an immediate need for optimization at this point; however, if performance enhancements are necessary given the complexity and number of configurations available, further analysis would likely indicate areas needing scrutiny rather than just observing existing patterns or variables in use. If you have specific coding questions about particular parts of the code or want advice on more general strategies, feel free to ask! |
||
|
|
||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -89,10 +89,10 @@ const webSiteRouter = { | |
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| path: '/websites/runtimes/donet', | ||
| name: 'doNet', | ||
| path: '/websites/runtimes/dotnet', | ||
| name: 'dotNet', | ||
| hidden: true, | ||
| component: () => import('@/views/website/runtime/donet/index.vue'), | ||
| component: () => import('@/views/website/runtime/dotnet/index.vue'), | ||
| meta: { | ||
| activeMenu: '/websites/runtimes/php', | ||
| requiresAuth: false, | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. There are no known discrepancies, errors, or inefficiencies with the provided JavaScript code. However, if you need help optimizing it further, please let me know! |
||
|
|
||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There are no known irregularities, issues, or optimization suggestions present in the code snippet provided. The current implementation appears to be functioning correctly.
The code checks for an existence of certain types of image files specified by the case statement (constant) and handles situations where they do and don't exist using switch cases respectively. Also, it validates various conditions related to paths/files such as checking if directories exists. Additionally, some functions like handlePHP() and checkPortExist() also perform their specific tasks efficiently while maintaining readability. Overall, there doesn't seem to be anything requiring major changes here.
For efficiency improvements, you might consider implementing caching mechanisms for frequently accessed files/directories or performing validations that require less overhead without impacting performance too much. However, such refinements would usually occur only when necessary after comprehensive testing has established the current function’s reliability and utility under different scenarios.