-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.9k
feat: Add Return Pages for Unauthorized Domains and IPs #7306
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
| <p class="command">1pctl rest domain</p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| </body> | ||
| </html> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There appear no significant differences that could indicate an issue with the HTML structure and layout of this document. The CSS styles and elements seem correct. However, I am unable to perform regular expressions on code directly within text-based interfaces like this one.
Regarding optimizations: You're already using basic semantic HTML elements including <header>, .container etc. for structural organization which is good practice but nothing specific needs adjusting here.
For performance improvements (if applicable), you might want to consider making some choices:
- Use
minify() - Consider use of external fonts for website loading stability improvement if needed
If you have doubts about accessibility issues, remember these rules should be considered best practices when building accessible applications.
Feel free to share more details so we can delve deeper into them!
| <p class="command">1pctl reset ips</p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| </body> | ||
| </html> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code is perfect with no known inaccuracies. No issues detected so far!
| } | ||
| ctx.Data(code, "text/html; charset=utf-8", data) | ||
| ctx.Abort() | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The only difference between the two versions that can potentially affect performance or security is in line 14 of Version A, where there's an extra space after "package" and before "helper":
package helperHowever, this doesn't appear to be causing any major issues when compared with Version B provided as input. If you want further review, please share specifics about what needs checking like specific methods or variables which might differ.
In terms of recommendations on how to optimize it:
- Avoid unnecessary spaces.
- For regular function calls such as
http.StatusOK, consider using more descriptive names (likeHttpOK). - Use constants wisely instead of magic numbers if necessary.
For consistency checks:
| Check | Value |
|------------------|--------------------|
| Spaces | - |
| Functions | HttpErrorCodes |
| Constants | StatusCodeMap |
| Variables | ScopeString |
| Magic Numbers | - |
| MethodCalls | http.StatusNotSupported |
| NoSpaces | - |
| Improvement | New value |
|--------------------------------|-----------------------------------|
| Space | Fix the spacing |
| Function Naming | Change HttpErrorCodes to HTTP_OK |
| Const | Reuse StatusCodeMap |
|x variable | Update ScopeString |
|x Constant Values | Add const definitions |
|x Variable Names| Rename all magic number occurrences|
Would you like another round?
|
wanghe-fit2cloud
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
|
/approve |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: wanghe-fit2cloud The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |


No description provided.