Skip to content

Conversation

@zhengkunwang223
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@f2c-ci-robot
Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Dec 10, 2024

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

<p class="command">1pctl rest domain</p>
</div>
</body>
</html>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There appear no significant differences that could indicate an issue with the HTML structure and layout of this document. The CSS styles and elements seem correct. However, I am unable to perform regular expressions on code directly within text-based interfaces like this one.

Regarding optimizations: You're already using basic semantic HTML elements including <header>, .container etc. for structural organization which is good practice but nothing specific needs adjusting here.

For performance improvements (if applicable), you might want to consider making some choices:

  1. Use minify()
  2. Consider use of external fonts for website loading stability improvement if needed

If you have doubts about accessibility issues, remember these rules should be considered best practices when building accessible applications.

Feel free to share more details so we can delve deeper into them!

<p class="command">1pctl reset ips</p>
</div>
</body>
</html>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code is perfect with no known inaccuracies. No issues detected so far!

}
ctx.Data(code, "text/html; charset=utf-8", data)
ctx.Abort()
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The only difference between the two versions that can potentially affect performance or security is in line 14 of Version A, where there's an extra space after "package" and before "helper":

package helper

However, this doesn't appear to be causing any major issues when compared with Version B provided as input. If you want further review, please share specifics about what needs checking like specific methods or variables which might differ.

In terms of recommendations on how to optimize it:

  • Avoid unnecessary spaces.
  • For regular function calls such as http.StatusOK, consider using more descriptive names (like HttpOK).
  • Use constants wisely instead of magic numbers if necessary.

For consistency checks:

| Check            | Value               |
|------------------|--------------------|
| Spaces          | -                     |
| Functions       | HttpErrorCodes     |
| Constants       | StatusCodeMap      |
| Variables        | ScopeString         |
| Magic Numbers   | -                    |
| MethodCalls     | http.StatusNotSupported     | 
| NoSpaces       | -                      |

| Improvement             | New value                        |
|--------------------------------|-----------------------------------|
| Space                | Fix the spacing                   |
| Function Naming     | Change HttpErrorCodes to HTTP_OK    |
| Const           | Reuse StatusCodeMap                 |
|x variable        | Update ScopeString              |
|x Constant Values         | Add const definitions           |
|x Variable Names| Rename all magic number occurrences| 

Would you like another round?

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
70.5% Duplication on New Code (required ≤ 10%)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

Copy link
Member

@wanghe-fit2cloud wanghe-fit2cloud left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@wanghe-fit2cloud
Copy link
Member

/approve

@f2c-ci-robot
Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Dec 10, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: wanghe-fit2cloud

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@wanghe-fit2cloud wanghe-fit2cloud merged commit db7180a into dev Dec 10, 2024
5 of 7 checks passed
@wanghe-fit2cloud wanghe-fit2cloud deleted the pr@dev@website branch December 10, 2024 03:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants