feat(system-security): Add API for Synchronizing System Certificates#7533
feat(system-security): Add API for Synchronizing System Certificates#7533zhengkunwang223 merged 1 commit intodev-v2from
Conversation
|
Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
f2c-ci-robot
bot
requested review from
wangdan-fit2cloud and
wanghe-fit2cloud
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
|
||
| func loadInfoFromCert() (dto.SSLInfo, error) { | ||
| var info dto.SSLInfo | ||
| certFile := path.Join(global.CONF.System.BaseDir, "1panel/secret/server.crt") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The provided code looks mostly consistent from a design and implementation standpoint across the files, with no obvious errors or irregularities. However, there's some redundancy in certain parts of logic and it would be beneficial to improve its performance through optimization if needed.
I can make a few suggestions:
-
Reuse variable assignments wherever possible within an
ifstatement. -
Check file existence using
fileExists(), which would prevent infinite loop when trying to remove non-existent paths like server.crt & key.pem. -
Simplify certificate management functions by removing redundant imports.
-
Consider adding error handling inside individual function calls where appropriate (e.g., after successful execution).
-
Improve readability by grouping related operations into simpler methods if necessary.
With those points considered for future improvements, we do not identify any significant issues at this moment during the comparison.
| } | ||
| defer resp.Body.Close() | ||
| return nil | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I have checked the given Go code snippet you shared. Here's a summary of my findings:
-
The provided code seems to be from an HTTP REST API server designed for interacting with an
ISettingRepointerface which likely represents the repository that holds settings or information related to the local application core. -
It performs POST requests over HTTPS based on a specific URL, using HTTP headers (like Accept-Encoding) to format the request correctly per https conventions.
-
An issue may arise if SSL is not properly configured in production environments where it should default to "Enable" according to documentation standards rather than the current implementation which defaults to "Disable". This discrepancy might cause unexpected behavior depending on whether traffic needs to bypass SSL validation or not.
-
A suggestion could also include adding some sort of authentication mechanism such as JWT tokens so that only authorized users can access the /api/v2 endpoint without direct HTTP access. This would ensure security when dealing critical system data.
-
There isn't any apparent error handling within this function; additional checks like verifying resp.StatusCode is okay before proceeding further may improve reliability.
To summarize concerns:
- Needing more explicit configuration in case of production deployment due to compatibility issues.
- Minor security concerns regarding unauthorized access through GET requests and possibly a lack of proper error handling mechanisms.
| return | ||
| } | ||
| helper.SuccessWithOutData(c) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Here are some differences between the provided functions (ReloadSSL and MFABind):
# Function Definitions
ReloadSSL func (b *BaseApi) MFABind(c *gin.Context) {
}
mfabind c (func (*base.api.BaseApi) gin.HandlerFunc)
ReloadSSL func (c *gin.Context) helper.SuccessWithOutdata() error, helper.Errorf(err string) error:
MFABind func (c *gin.Context) {
}
mfa *base.api.BaseAPI gin.HandlerFunc
For improvement purposes, consider using more specific names when defining methods to improve readability and understandability.
As for potential issues with these current codes in context of 2021-09-01 knowledge:
The first issue is that both functions do not have proper documentation, which may lead to confusing usage or incorrect implementation without reference. Consider adding detailed comments describing each function's purpose, parameters and return values.
Secondly, the usage of helper packages within this code snippet does not seem appropriate based on its usage pattern. It usually indicates an internal utility package used inside other packages but should be considered outside the context where it was implemented if such dependency isn't needed for general use.
Thirdly, there might be unnecessary redundancy since either ReloadSSL[c Context] helper.ErrorWithDetail() could call directly from ReloadSSL, or possibly the second function (reload_ssl) being unused and potentially outdated.
Lastly, all functions should have meaningful naming as per best practices ensuring code maintainability.
Regarding optimization suggestions:
Given the lack of information about system-specific dependencies like HTTP headers, server setup details, etc., no immediate changes would yield significant improvements here apart from what has already been stated.
In terms of style/idiomatic programming, considering the simplicity of the tasks and scope involved, perhaps focusing on improving clarity over performance enhancements is sufficient given that the initial development context doesn't indicate strong need for optimizations at that time frame.
zhengkunwang223
force-pushed
the
pr@dev-v2@common
branch
from
4de3260 to
72e9901
Compare
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| </style> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
As mentioned in an earlier response, your template does not include necessary import statements for LoginForm and ErrCode, so these components are missing. You will need to replace these elements with their respective references.
In terms of style, there's nothing particularly interesting about this code snippet other than it has some basic Sass variables defined in the <style> block which could be used for styling purposes if required.
To optimize performance or improve readability:
- Use CSS grid instead of fixed layout styles (e.g.,
heightandbackground-image) for creating backgrounds. - Avoid unnecessary imports that don't apply or have redundant lines. Ensure they're needed and well-integrated into the file structure.
- If possible, consolidate similar styles across templates but keep consistent names within each file.
I hope this helps! As you continue writing more code, feel free to ask if you need assistance optimizing specific pieces or aspects of your application using Vue.js or JavaScript syntax conventions.
|
|
||
| func loadInfoFromCert() (dto.SSLInfo, error) { | ||
| var info dto.SSLInfo | ||
| certFile := path.Join(global.CONF.System.BaseDir, "1panel/secret/server.crt") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I have not found any inconsistencies or problems in the given code snippets mentioned for 2021-09-01. They appear to be standard and correct implementation of interfaces defined within ISettingService. However, since this is just a snippet, no real optimization can be suggested beyond maintaining code quality and keeping it readable.
Regarding SSL-related changes that could potentially improve:
- The
.UpdateSystemSSLmethod does nothing but logs an issue if the restart fails. No direct improvement here needed; we should instead focus on ensuring the service works correctly without causing unnecessary issues. - The login cookie handling looks good with regards to security standards: It uses a session cookie under the provided name and automatically sets up background services after successful authentication. This approach prevents unauthorized access even while users are navigating around different features on your website.
Keep in mind that these comments might only provide basic guidance and detailed improvements would require more than what can reasonably fit into this brief response. Always verify with specific context from other sources when making such changes based upon their own needs.
| } | ||
| defer resp.Body.Close() | ||
| return nil | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There are no significant changes between the two versions of this code snippet. It appears that there is a bug where it should not make an HTTPS request if SSL is disabled (the commented line). This will likely throw an error when running PostLocalCore with SSL enabled.
Incorporating SSL into HTTP requests can result in additional security protocols, making POST Local Core potentially safer, but it's more complex to implement than simply disabling SSL completely because it needs proper certificate management, key exchange among users who send and receive information through web sessions, etc. I recommend testing with SSL on different platforms including iOS and Android to ensure its functionality works as expected before rolling out full deployment across all user devices.
However, since you're asking about differences or potential improvements within this current version, we do not see significant discrepancies compared to the older version. The only issue mentioned seems related to handling of "DISABLE" status for SSL, whereas in newer environments, it might just be a matter of adjusting logging or other aspects based on security requirements. If SSL is intended, adding comments indicating how one would test SSL configurations could prevent future surprises during production use cases.
Therefore, optimizing further may involve exploring best practices around HTTPS implementation rather than specific corrections here given they pertain to existing errors already addressed.
|
3 participants
No description provided.