feat: Synchronously update the firewall when modifying connection inf…#7536
feat: Synchronously update the firewall when modifying connection inf…#7536wanghe-fit2cloud merged 1 commit intodev-v2from
Conversation
|
Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
| return port | ||
| } | ||
| return "" | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The provided code seems to be incomplete with certain sections missing, including the LoadFromCert, etc. However, based on what you've shared, there seem to be some regular coding standards violated like using strings directly instead of a struct for error handling and variable names that don't follow Go conventions.
Here's a basic outline:
Check for Regular Irregularities
- Check for unnecessary or irrelevant comments.
- Ensure consistent use of single quotes around variables.
- Ensure function parameter naming follows proper convention (for example, without space 'Port' should ideally translate into 'Port').
- Make sure imports are organized correctly.
- Verify consistency between interface and implementation parts where applicable.
|
|
||
| _, _ = cmd.Execf("ufw delete allow %s", oldPort) | ||
| return nil | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There are no major issues with the given snippet. The code seems to correctly uses cmd for executing shell commands on different systems based on which package name they have chosen.
However, minor improvements like considering the return types of the executables (return int, not returning an error), and using a const variable rather than hardcoding values for the ports might be beneficial:
// Define constants here if needed
const (
oldPort = "80" // Change to your old port here
newPort = "443" // Example new port from above example
... // rest similar
)
func UpdatePort(oldPort string, newPort string) error {
switch f := &foo{nil}: {f.func1(); }
return fooUpdateNewOrOldPort(oldPort, newPort)
}This small change could make the function more readable since it doesn't rely on hard-coded values and can easily maintain multiple ports. Also, this kind of refactoring helps prevent future errors related to changing variables.
|
|
||
| func InitAgentRouter(Router *gin.RouterGroup) {} | ||
|
|
||
| func UpdateMasterAddr(newAddr string) error { return nil } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There are no known abnormalities or issues with the provided code snippet. All function definitions appear to be correctly formatted for Golang and there are no obvious errors in variable declarations or usage patterns. However, due to the limitations of this platform, we can only analyze these files based on their current state at September 1st, 2021. For more detailed analyses, consider checking the Go source files from the time period you specified.
Optimization Suggestions:
As an assistant, I'd recommend optimizing any performance bottlenecks found during analysis of the code. It's also beneficial to follow best coding practices and adhere to standard conventions (e.g., not using "import" statements directly after module imports, ensuring consistent spacing). Additionally, testing thoroughly before implementation is always crucial for reliability.
Keep the code up-to-date as newer versions often improve performance and add features that might not have been included in older releases; regularly update packages used in the project, where applicable.
|



No description provided.