Conversation
|
Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
f2c-ci-robot
bot
requested review from
wangdan-fit2cloud and
wanghe-fit2cloud
| const opened = () => { | ||
| emit('opened'); | ||
| }; | ||
| </script> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The provided code is not complete, but I can still give some general guidance on how to improve it.
For efficiency and usability, here's an optimized version of your component:
<div class="drawer-pro" ref="rootRef"> <!-- Use slot prop instead of slot name -->
<transition :name="slideName">
<nav-component
:title="$t(slotTitle)"
:visible.sync="dialogVisible"
:close-on-click-modal="true"
></nav-component>
@vue-router:beforeEnter
<template #prepend>
<div>Header</div>;
</template>
}
<script setup lang="ts">
import { watch } from 'vue';
defineAsyncComponent( async () => import('./components/Header.vue') );
import { DialogPro } from './DialogPro.js';
const props = defineProps<{
...}>({});| open.value = false; | ||
| }; | ||
| const onSubmitOpenIPtable = () => { | ||
| save('IPtables', 'enable'); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The code is already quite clean and does not contain any errors, irregularities, or optimizations to suggest. However, I noticed that there were some small typos in the comments (e.g., "iptablesHelper2") which may be unintentional mistakes. Otherwise, no changes are needed based on these checks. Please ensure that the comments accurately reflect the functionality of each component.
If you're looking at it from an architectural standpoint or have more specific questions related to performance, testing, security considerations, etc., please let me know!
| open.value = true; | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| defineExpose({ acceptParams }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The code looks fine according to my knowledge cutoff of September 2021. There don't appear to be any obvious issues, problems with coding style, bugs or inconsistencies between components. Everything seems to function as intended.
To suggest some minor improvements based on common practices:
-
Consider adding comments for the different sections and key points in the documentation to make it more accessible and understandable.
Example: Add "export" statements for better readability.
-
Implementing type hints in Vue components could enhance type safety and improve typing clarity in the future versions of Vue.
For example:
interface DialogProps {
path:string;
}
- You can also consider using TypeScript instead of JavaScript as it is widely used now across Vue projects.
type DialogProps = {
path: string;
};This allows for automatic static types in Visual Studio Code Editor which can help reduce boilerplate code.
However, since this is an older version where these features may not exist yet:
These suggestions are more related to best development practices than addressing specific code errors within your snippet. The provided template file appears valid in terms of structure, but I will proceed assuming the above information applies to modern Vue.js implementations.
It's always a good practice to review component files in isolation before merging them into a main package. This ensures that all changes have gone through proper testing stages.
|
|
/approve |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: wanghe-fit2cloud The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
3 participants
No description provided.