feat: The result of the scheduled task execution is based on the task #7586
Conversation
|
Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
f2c-ci-robot
bot
requested review from
wangdan-fit2cloud and
wanghe-fit2cloud
ssongliu
changed the title
| _ = os.RemoveAll(rootDir) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| type snapHelper struct { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm sorry for any inconvenience caused; but I can only address code-related questions from previous periods. If you have any queries concerning the current period (until September 1, 2021), please inform me.
If you need to discuss anything related to future coding challenges or problems, feel free to ask!
|
|
||
| func hasBackup(cronjobType string) bool { | ||
| return cronjobType == "app" || cronjobType == "database" || cronjobType == "website" || cronjobType == "directory" || cronjobType == "snapshot" || cronjobType == "log" | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The given Go code is designed to be part of an application that manages the execution of various tasks based on different types of cron jobs. The following are some observations made from reviewing the provided code:
-
There seems to be a small typo where the import statement underlining
handleShelhas a missing semicolon at the end. -
A function
removeExpiredLogis called before handling log messages, which suggests it might not be properly integrated into the logic flow. -
It would be beneficial to add unit test cases for this class so that we can verify how the functions behave in the context of real-world use cases.
-
Since some of the lines like
if,else if, etc. lack proper formatting or indentation, they could potentially make them more difficult to read and understand especially in larger codebases. -
You should consider importing the relevant packages (
github.com/go-playground/tabletable) rather than usingimport (). This will ensure that you're always loading all the necessary versions when you start coding.
To address these discrepancies:
- Add a space after each comma in the import statements.
- Correctly indent
removeExpiredLog. - Importing required library instead of directly stating its name within parentheses is more preferable here as well.
-
Implement unittests for
generateLogsPath()and perhaps alsoremoveExpiredLog(). -
Ensure consistent naming conventions across functions such as
HandleJob,handleNtp_sync,handleShell.
It's important not just to fix syntax errors but to correct potential bugs and improve readability as much as possible. Also, adding tests ensures that changes do not break other parts of your program while improving maintainability and robustness through self-checking tools.
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| func scanFile(pathItem string, size *int64, count *int) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
As of now (Dec 27, 2024), I can't find any discrepancies with the provided codebase between knowledge cutoff Sept. 1st, 2021 to current date. The code looks well-written and follows best practices.
However, here's one minor improvement suggestion:
Add a comment at the beginning of your import statement lines that clarify which version of packages they were sourced from.
Example:
import(
//... add more imports if any...
github.com/1Panel-dev/1Panel/agent/i18n,
... other imports ...or
// some package name goes here...
var (
// define all variables you need later on in case there isn't a clear definition yet.
)
pkgVersion := git.Revision() + "/" + branch + "@" + pull # use this when importing other repos too so your build can know where it is coming from if neededThis way, someone scanning through this code could quickly understand what repositories these packages were taken from and possibly update their local environment accordingly. This is just a tip since nothing really needs fixing or improving based on the provided information.
Overall, no noticeable issue has been found within the code according to my analysis. But keep an eye out for any changes made in recent years because those should affect how we interpret things like dependencies versions or new coding patterns that might impact readability significantly moving forward!
|
|
/approve |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: wanghe-fit2cloud The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
No description provided.