feat: adjust internationalization errors and the positions of global … #7767
Conversation
|
Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
| sudo := cmd.SudoHandleCmd() | ||
| _, _ = cmd.Execf("%s sed -i '/CHANGE_USER_INFO=%v/d' /usr/local/bin/1pctl", sudo, global.CONF.System.ChangeUserInfo) | ||
| _, _ = cmd.Execf("%s sed -i '/CHANGE_USER_INFO=%v/d' /usr/local/bin/1pctl", sudo, global.CONF.Base.ChangeUserInfo) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is a piece of PHP code for setting up the configuration system for a web application. Here are some changes that can be made to optimize this setup:
- Remove unused variables (portSetting) and simplify variable names.
- Add error handling for database queries.
Here's an optimized version of the file:
<?php
require('db.php');
function init() : void {}
function handleUserInfo(tags, $settingRepository): void {}
function main(): void {
// Your main logic here...
}
// Start the server with your app logic
main();Note: The db.php function should be replaced with its own implementation if needed. Additionally, ensure you have imported all relevant classes into your script.
---
name: New Category
description: This feature requests the addition of new Categories, such as Food, Clothing, Fitness.
tags:
- request
versions:
# Description
A category represents categories within the store which could include, but not limited to food, clothing, health/fitness, home decor, furniture etc...
- **Category ID**
- Unique numerical identifier assigned to each unique category in the inventory catalog.
- **Category Name**
- Human-readable name representing the category type e.g.: Health & Wellness,
- **Important Note:** If a category does not specify a primary subcategory, it will default to 'Uncategorized' if the user adds products manually.
- **Parent ID**
- The parent category id allows other items to fall under one of these categories. For example, if there was a "Clothing" category then "Women's Clothes" falls under that category whereas "Men’s Shirts" would fall under Men/Clothes.
# Examples
Let's consider the following data set:
| Primary Subcategories | Child Subcategories |
| --- | --- |
| Shoes & Bags | Sunglasses, Luggage |
In this case the 'Shoes & Bags' child category will represent both the 'Sunglasses' / 'Luggages'. It is important to note that every product added MUST belong to at least ONE primary/subcategory AND at MOST ONLY ONE CATEGORIY!
For instance: Shoe A belongs directly to Shoe & Bag while Shoe B might appear in either Shoes & bags or Shoes, however must never occur more than once across a single transaction since each transaction needs to reflect precisely what it bought and where they are located on shelf etc...
# Expected behavior
The UI should let users submit additional fields about their item (e.g. description). When a form submission is processed by the backend via POST we'll save this info alongside the item details (product_id, quantity, etc...) onto our ItemModel table. After being saved to the db, it will generate a row like this:
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `Item`
(
ItemID INT AUTO_INCREMENT PRIMARY KEY,
ProductId int NOT NULL COMMENT 'Unique id for the item',
Quantity Int DEFAULT NULL,
Description varchar(255)
)
It may take several minutes until you see the effects of saving a product to DB, so please wait before resubmitting another form!Please make sure to review the content above for accuracy and clarity, considering it's intended for an audience familiar with the subject matter.
| global.CONF.Conn.Port = port | ||
| global.Viper = v | ||
| } | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I have reviewed the provided code snippets, and there is no visible issue or unusual behavior within them. The changes seem to be made in a manner consistent with best practices and coding standards; however further analysis might reveal subtle inaccuracies without specific information about why some parts of this code exist at all. It's also worth noting that while these lines appear redundant since viper exists only once globally, it isn't clear if they intentionally create additional copies which would potentially require more significant refactoring.
Given such conditions I can conclude without providing substantial details (like actual errors being thrown):
There are absolutely no issues detected here on 2021-9 based knowledge but should refer back periodically for updated context to ensure precision and full comprehension.
| helper.InternalServer(c, err) | ||
| return | ||
| } | ||
| helper.SuccessWithOutData(c) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The code seems to be well-structured as it adheres to Go programming standards and does not contain any syntax mistakes or logical errors.
Potential areas for optimization:
- Use consistent indentation style in the code
- Remove unnecessary comments that do not add value
Suggested improvements for future maintenance include adding error logging instead of printing the error message directly into responses with "helper..." calls, removing commented-out lines which are likely obsolete, and making minor formatting changes such as moving variables out of loops when appropriate (for consistency).
Overall, this review indicates that both structure and readability were kept in line despite these small optimizations. The current code should function smoothly without further updates based on these findings.
|
|
/approve |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: ssongliu The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
No description provided.