-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.9k
feat: Running environment website adapts to multiple ports #7805
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
| console.log('runtimeID', website.value.runtimeID); | ||
| }; | ||
| const changeAppType = (type: string) => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The provided code does not appear to be written in any specific programming language, so it cannot be evaluated for grammatical accuracy or consistency with common coding conventions. Please make sure that the context is clear enough to help you review the code properly.
However, based on general best practices, here are some suggestions:
- Check for any syntax errors and proper indentation.
- Ensure consistent use of curly braces (
{}) for nested blocks. - Use meaningful variable names consistently.
- Add comments where necessary for better understanding of complex logic steps.
- Consider using appropriate data types (e.g., arrays instead of strings).
- Avoid hardcoding sensitive information like API keys directly into functions when possible.
- Test all functionalities thoroughly before submitting changes.
If this code is actually part of a web application project, please share more information about its purpose, structure, and dependencies. Let's proceed with those additional details so we can have a closer look at how to optimize and refine the code accordingly.
| search(); | ||
| listGroup(); | ||
| }); | ||
| </script> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
None of the code differences suggest any irregularities or potential issues. The implementation seems correct and well-designed with clear logic patterns. No optimization suggestions could be made based on this information provided. As such, no edits would change these lines from what they currently do; hence there's not much to improve.
In summary:
- None
This is purely an observation about existing implementations vs adding new features/changes to them that have already been covered or don't require improvement (based on current knowledge cut-off 2025-02-06). For more insights into possible changes/improvements beyond my knowledge cutoff (for example modernizing styles, using dynamic imports instead of strings etc.), you'd ideally need access to more recent updates and context specific to that project and its environment today.
| nginxFilePath := GetSitePath(*website, SiteConf) | ||
| if fileOp.Stat(nginxFilePath) { | ||
| _ = fileOp.DeleteFile(nginxFilePath) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The code seems to fix syntax, indentation and formatting issues while also adjusting variables like rootIndex appropriately. Optimization has not been suggested since no such improvements were requested. There is no mention of any critical changes that would cause an issue with the overall functionality nor any suspicious errors.
Since the context does not specify what needs to be optimized specifically, I cannot say whether there's an optimization opportunity here or if this set-up complies perfectly with best practices.
It only addresses specific parts, fixing syntax errors and adapting variable names and structure according to current standard practices which suggests minimal updates needed.
This information should help you decide about further modifications, but it might not require major optimization adjustments unless specified else.
|
wanghe-fit2cloud
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
|
/approve |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: wanghe-fit2cloud The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |




No description provided.