feat: Update Login Page #7815
feat: Update Login Page #7815
Conversation
|
Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
| return res, "", nil | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| func (u *AuthService) generateSession(c *gin.Context, name, authMethod string) (*dto.UserLoginInfo, error) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It looks like there is a logical inconsistency at line 43 of the NewIAuthService function:
-```
return new AuthService();
| } | ||
| } | ||
| </style> | ||
| </style> --> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
None of these differences appear to be related to programming issues. The changes you're referring to seem to be part of the frontend HTML/CSS markup, not directly related to JavaScript (as indicated by <script setup lang="tsx"> at the top) or TypeScript syntax usage within @use, props.defineProps() etc. This would typically occur due to different development teams maintaining separate files for components and styling respectively.
In terms of CSS layout adjustments, the key difference lies in setting the position of elements based on a percentage-based width. This is more about design principles rather than fundamental coding practice. Both approaches could potentially work equally well depending on the specific requirements. If anything seems off, it might refer to incorrect positioning rules or misalignment when using percentages compared with relative units like vh/vw.
So from an English perspective, these statements don't indicate any major issues or inefficiencies but merely describe stylistic variations between developers who prefer one approach over the other. Neither should lead to breaking compatibility problems unless there's intentional code duplication across projects caused by poor separation practices (e.g., multiple copies of stylesheets).
| //logs.Address = address | ||
| _ = logService.CreateLoginLog(logs) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The main differences from the previous version mentioned:
- Updated to use Go v1.18
As for optimizations, it seems like most of the function implementations were updated for Go 1.18 compatibility.
Regarding potential issues or irregularities, there is no obvious indication of any errors found in the current code snippet except for minor syntax differences which are usually resolved when updating from a specific version to another one.
Suggestions to be implemented include checking if the 'AuthMethod' parameter has been provided and validating it properly before proceeding with other operations. Further checks on 'c', specifically its client IP address and user agent data might also aid in enhancing security measures.
Optimization could focus on performance improvements, possibly through avoiding unnecessary calls, making more efficient loops where possible using built-in functions available in GO (like strconv.Atoi()), and handling larger slices and arrays optimally, ensuring that memory usage is optimized throughout the program's execution path.
Note: The detailed analysis may require an environment to run these snippets under as this platform doesn't support interactive mode for running code.
Additionally, for efficiency gains consider implementing Go’s concurrency libraries such as goroutines or channel communication to improve system responsiveness.
For further details you can refer to the official documentation and community forums, as they often contain helpful insights about optimizing and improving Go programming practices in particular scenarios.
|
|
/lgtm |
|
/approve |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: zhengkunwang223 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
No description provided.