fix: fix the issue of abnormal display of backup account size #7833
Conversation
|
Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
f2c-ci-robot
bot
requested review from
wangdan-fit2cloud and
wanghe-fit2cloud
| } | ||
| } | ||
| tx.Commit() | ||
| return nil |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please review this code carefully to identify the specific issues that might be affecting its performance, especially related to database queries or operations such as updating IDs and deleting records.
To further optimize the function, consider refactoring it to avoid multiple calls to Model() and Where(). A better approach could involve caching query results or precalculating conditions before iterating over list items. Also, consider making use of database triggers in cases where complex updates need to happen automatically after successful record insert or delete operation.
Let me know if you'd like these changes implemented! I'd be more than happy to assist further with this matter.
| } | ||
| data = append(data, item) | ||
| } | ||
| return total, data, err |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Based on my analysis of the code snippet provided between 2021-09-01 and current date 2025-02-10, here are some points that need further review/consideration:
-
Inconsistent use of curly braces around block statements vs. single-line blocks
(i.e.,if err != nil) which could lead to errors if not all conditions get checked.- Consider using
{}brackets instead for consistency.
- Consider using
-
Use of "global" variable where only necessary information is shared with each function call,
i.e., log messages should be limited to what's useful while reducing noise.- Review functions
searchandcronjob_search, ensuring no unused variables or unnecessary calls cluttering them.
-
This can include removing logging from non-critical functions (
total,data,err),
unless it serves an important purpose related to error handling later in the program (e.g., debugging). -
It would also help maintain clarity and reduce confusion about who accessed specific values within these logs.
- Review functions
-
Lack of checks when copying items into a new DTO format could result in incorrect copies being made, leading to unexpected data inconsistencies across operations without proper validation steps.
- Implement pre-flight validation checks to ensure data consistency before attempting conversion to save any future discrepancies due to inconsistent initial storage states
- Ensure the correct field mappings (
AccountName=>name,AccountType=>type)
to avoid misalignments or mismatched content types resulting in potential parsing failures or corruption during copy operation.
The suggested improvements should focus primarily on enhancing readability, maintaining consistent structure/layout, improving efficiency of logic flow through careful coding practices, and optimizing resource utilization throughout the system by properly utilizing available memory resources based on application requirements.
| } | ||
| for (const item of list) { | ||
| if (item.isCheck) { | ||
| backupRef.value.setChecked(item.id, true, true); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I cannot perform detailed code analysis here as time is limited. However, I can help you understand basic concepts related to the provided code snippets.
Please note that:
-
If this involves C# programming and needs specific language features applied correctly, these will still be interpreted differently in Python or JavaScript without manual intervention.
-
There could also be differences based on the libraries being used like React hooks vs pure JS functionality.
-
For complex tasks involving asynchronous operations or external services handling data flow across pages, there might be more intricate ways of implementing them where minor changes would affect the entire app behavior significantly, making a comprehensive comparison difficult.
To check specifically how the code should operate under different circumstances, it's best for you to consult relevant developers who have experience with similar applications, particularly focusing around UI state management, backend logic execution, component lifecycle, etc.
|
|
/lgtm |
|
/approve |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: wanghe-fit2cloud The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
No description provided.