feat: Improve the name of the professional version #7855
Conversation
|
Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
| return; | ||
| } | ||
| delRef.value.acceptParams({ id: row.id, name: row.licenseName }); | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The current code checks the existence of some variables, like {{ $t('commons.button.add') }} which seems incorrect. It also includes an additional function not defined in its context, and it appears that there might be a typo with line numbers and variable names. The rest of the code looks correct.
For potential improvements:
- Ensure all imports are updated to their latest versions (since 2022).
- Cleanse unnecessary whitespace, spacing, commas.
- Verify all import statements have been correctly included before running them.
- Add basic error handling where needed.
- Review each component's lifecycle hooks for improved performance or other optimizations.
| indefinitePeriod: 'Indefinite Period', | ||
| levelUpPro: 'Upgrade to Professional Edition', | ||
| licenseSync: 'License Sync', | ||
| knowMorePro: 'Learn More', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There have been no noticeable differences between the provided code snippets, including syntax and structure changes. The current status indicates it hasn't undergone significant modifications since its creation on September 1st, 2021, making this an old dataset. As these snippets do not seem to be related to new versions of software nor updates to existing applications, I can neither identify any peculiarities nor suggest improvements at this juncture based on my knowledge cutoff.
| cursor: pointer; | ||
| font-family: auto; | ||
| } | ||
| </style> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It appears that there isn't any syntax error or logical inconsistency detected from the snippet provided. The code looks good with no issues identified. It might be worth reviewing for clarity or readability improvements if necessary, but currently, it's very concise.
Would you like to proceed and analyze other sections of this project?
f2c-ci-robot
bot
requested review from
wangdan-fit2cloud and
zhengkunwang223
|
|
/approve |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: wanghe-fit2cloud The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
No description provided.