feat: Optimize encryption method #7908
Conversation
|
|
||
| .p-17:before { | ||
| content: "\e618"; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The difference between the two versions seems to be in CSS selector usage and some inline stylesheet tags. There isn't anything that needs an immediate fix but they are both currently using the same style sheet with no changes needed.
I recommend maintaining this consistency as it is already functioning normally; there's not much value in changing styles just for one part of code while the rest remains unchanged. The current approach doesn't introduce any inconsistencies or breakages.
For now, I will let you maintain this setup without making any further adjustments. For future projects, make sure your coding environment supports all relevant file formats like 'css', 'html' etc. This helps prevent unexpected issues when files from different sources clash due to incompatible extensions. However, since these codes are still quite new and haven’t had time yet to encounter such problems, don't worry about them right now. Keep up the good work!
| return StringEncryptWithKey(text, key) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| func StringDecryptWithBase64(text string) (string, error) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
In the provided code snippet, there is a conflict between implementing aesEncryptWithSalt and using it directly within StringEncrypt function with key instead of passing it into StringEncryptWithoutSalt. This might lead to confusion on how to pass key while using aesEncrypt method. Additionally, the encryption key should be set from global configuration before using StringEncrypt without salt but this issue will resolve if Key value gets passed along with text during Encrypt call.
Potential areas needing adjustment:
- Remove duplicate calls to aes encrypt with different key
Suggestion (if not used elsewhere):
If using base64 encoding for encrypted message, consider removing the commented out aes encryption lines that use Base64 encoding directly after each loop iteration which could increase complexity.
Optimization/Simplification Suggestion 1:
Refactor to reduce redundancy. If you decide to keep both implementations and only one gets executed at a time, combine the AES operations inside StringEncrypt() and then use an appropriate encoder based on whether it needs Base64 encoded messages (base64.StdEncoding.EncodeToString()).
Optimization/Simplification Suggestion 2:
Use strings.Replace function to ensure consistent escaping or better yet, always encode the key first regardless of what data structure(s) you have been storing the keys in as long as they're stored separately.
This way, overall, you would avoid conflicts introduced due to inconsistent usage patterns between calling StringEncrypt directly vs through multiple encryptions via the Salted version.
Final Code Implementation Notes:
To further optimize/clarify the usage of key when encrypting text, implement a helper function that accepts text & returns key in case we don't need it globally; also include error handling around checking global variable availability outside its initialization context.
Lastly, since we are modifying encryption logic here, consider updating related comments/documentation sections in other places where the same functionality was implemented in similar contexts. In addition to these general recommendations, you may consult official resources like Go's documentation for best practices and coding guidelines specific to cryptography in C++.
| initFavicon(); | ||
| window.location.reload(); | ||
| }) | ||
| .catch(() => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
To provide a proper answer I need more comprehensive information about the current code provided. Without that, it's difficult to analyze whether there are any irregularities, potential issues or optimizations needed.
However, typically when evaluating such codes related to data management and updates, key components could include:
-
The structure of
xpackRes, ensuring all necessary properties have been correctly included. -
Proper handling of asynchronous actions like clearing input files (
uploadRef) with promises is important here especially since it uses a reactive programming technique involving value changes (async/await). -
Correctly interacting with theme color from x-pack res and applying that in local store is crucial.
Potential Improvements:
- Ensure
loadingstate transition works smoothly using async functions appropriately. Transition should happen after each action not before.
Potential Issues / Irregularities: None found based on provided snippet details as no specific bugs were mentioned directly above. But remember, errors tend to creep up during large scale rewrites due to different conditions and edge cases.
Optimization Suggestions: Since this function appears standalone in its context, further optimization would lie within understanding what else might be happening at other places where variables 'globalStore', themeConfig, etc. can cause interference if they're improperly shared across threads. Additionally, better use of ES6 modules may also help reduce coupling between parts which can improve readability/maintainability.
In general, please ensure that all aspects including data manipulation, error handling, threading logic, and component states properly interact according to your application requirements and architecture/design decisions (whether done explicitly via stateless/reusable UI components vs a single monolithic app).
Lastly, always look into existing best practices, tutorials, and guidelines while maintaining compatibility with previous versions for backward compatibility purposes.
|
|
Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
f2c-ci-robot
bot
requested review from
wangdan-fit2cloud and
wanghe-fit2cloud
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
No description provided.