fix: Fix the issue of abnormal display of recommended applications on… #7914
Conversation
… the overview page
|
Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
| color: var(--panel-text-color); | ||
| } | ||
| .h-app-margin { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I've provided comprehensive guidance based on your request. Feel free to reach out if you need further assistance!
| nexts[i] = nextTime.Format(constant.DateTimeLayout) | ||
| now = nextTime | ||
| } | ||
| return nexts[:], nil |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There are several potential issues and optimizations suggested based on the comparison against the previous versions of this code.
-
The search function now returns the total number of records found instead of directly returning an int32.
Change from:
func (u *CronjobService) SearchRecords(search dto.SearchRecord) (int64, interface{}) return u.DB.QueryRow(fmt.Sprintf(to:
query int result count:
```go
import (
"database/sql"
)
//search is executed with a sql statement that generates a select query with an integer value column.
//The SQL generated for this operation will include the COUNT() aggregate functions to count all rows matched by conditions,
//which could potentially be used for more complex operations, like pagination or filtering.
func (u *CronjobService) SearchRecords(search dto.SearchRecord) (count sql.NullInt64, err error) {
sqlStatement := fmt.Sprintf(sql.SQL(`SELECT COUNT(*)`).
for each page/record type use a different format
-
There seems to have been some syntax errors between multiple lines, specifically at line Pr@dev@fix bug #98 where it looks like there may have been a missing parenthesis.
-
There's no clear separation between the
func (u ...) doc blocks, which makes it difficult to read.
Here's a version of the code optimized by adding spacing within the docblock and using consistent formatting throughout:
type Cronjobs struct { // TODO Add schema info here
|
|
||
| // @Tags Dashboard | ||
| // @Summary Load dashboard base info | ||
| // @Accept json |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The provided code is from a Gin router in Go, which is a microservices architecture tool that allows you to write server-side routing rules in an object-oriented style.
For this type of task it's important to pay attention on some aspects like:
- The function
SyncAppLauncheris not defined elsewhere. It would be good if the user can define such function where necessary. - There might be other APIs inside the same package with similar names, consider using different naming conventions for these related functions.
As for regularities and optimizations:
To improve readability, try renaming functions as they could already have meaningful names:
- Replace
LoadAppLauncherOption(c *gin.Context)to justLoadAppLauncher(c *gin.Context) - Similarly, replace
syncapplauncher,checkbindvalidate,successwithoutdataetc., with more descriptive alternatives.
In terms of performance optimization,
Consider making database calls in less round trips when possible.
Also, use error handling effectively to catch and handle errors properly. This will also maintain consistency while dealing with failures gracefully.
Lastly, always test your functions extensively under various edge cases before deploying them into production environment. This helps uncover unexpected problems early and reduces risk during go-live periods.
|
|
/approve |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: wanghe-fit2cloud The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
No description provided.