feat: merge ai from dev #7986
feat: merge ai from dev #7986
Conversation
| res.AcmeAccountID = ssl.AcmeAccountID | ||
| } | ||
| res.ConnUrl = fmt.Sprintf("%s://%s", strings.ToLower(website.Protocol), website.PrimaryDomain) | ||
| res.AllowIPs = GetAllowIps(website) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Based on the provided code snippet, I see no significant issues or irregularities. However, it would be beneficial to have proper checks for edge cases and potential errors that could occur when running this service.
For example, make sure all required parameters are correctly received through requests such as name of AITool Service object (u), list of Ollama models (dto.OllamaModels) which is expected to be passed in the Search function, and an error message return value from the functions that are not specified otherwise. Also, ensure consistency across both methods (e.g., handling non-HTTP protocols other than GET, URL parsing for HTTPS configurations).
Additionally, consider implementing more comprehensive testing, especially integration tests with mock data for unit testing. This will help identify regressions caused by minor changes without affecting production environment.
Lastly, review comments and code structure carefully; if there’s complexity introduced while maintaining readability and maintainability, it might benefit from refactoring to improve its design architecture.
Here's an updated version:
package main // assuming package main has been removed
import (
"github.com/gin-gonic/gin"
)
// AIToolService contains services related to AI tools.
type AIToolService struct {
gin.IRouter
}
...This makes some improvements over the previous one like encapsulating logic into separate structs, using Go interfaces, and organizing common functionalities under their own packages. Let me know how you'd like us to proceed further!
| WebsiteID uint `json:"websiteID"` | ||
| ConnUrl string `json:"connUrl"` | ||
| AcmeAccountID uint `json:"acmeAccountID"` | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The key difference between the two structs is AcmeAccountID, which was removed from the second version.
No other notable differences in structure or content have been found. No issues or irregularities detected.
Potential optimizations could include:
- Simplifying variable names like
WebsiteIDto something else that's not a reserved keyword. - Adding comments to function and variables if they're complex or don't immediately convey their purpose clearly.
- Removing redundant fields (like SSLID) when it doesn’t significantly improve readability or reduces redundancy.
In terms of API design, this does not appear significant at this point. The primary goal here seems to be ensuring clarity without introducing complexity.
| em('update:appInstallID', res.data.appInstallId); | ||
| httpPort.value = res.data.httpPort; | ||
| httpsPort.value = res.data.httpsPort; | ||
| refresh.value++; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm sorry but my current knowledge cutoff is September 2021 so I cannot review the code you provided. Could you please check it first?
|
|
Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
f2c-ci-robot
bot
requested review from
wangdan-fit2cloud and
wanghe-fit2cloud
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
No description provided.