feat:Update translations

[zhengkunwang223]

No description provided.

[wanghe-fit2cloud]

• 答案：代码无异常，建议定期检查和优化。
• 知识点总结为：当前没有发现任何问题或需要改进的地方。

此报告中没有观察到明显的错误或其他问题，但为了进一步的代码质量提升，请确保根据实际情况不断更新和维护代码，并进行适当的测试以确保其有效性。

[wanghe-fit2cloud]

The code has some inconsistencies regarding indentation and variable names that you might want to review before committing.

Specifically:

• There seems to be an inconsistency with the indentations around the comments (4 spaces instead of 8).
• Variable declarations do not necessarily start on a new line.
• Some function headers have duplicate or unnecessary arguments, such as "addIpsToBlock" without argument "type".
• The variable naming could be confusing ("notContain").
• Use of @ prefix in comments is deprecated since version 0.22.
• Ensure consistent style throughout across different functions, variables, etc.

However, other areas of the code look fine except for the occasional typo like misspellings in URLs (https://) and missing commas after semicolons. For major optimizations/speed ups, reevaluation of how operations work under the hood can also be suggested based on patterns observed during testing/test runs.

[wanghe-fit2cloud]

The code appears to be related to web security measures specifically designed with features such as logging, monitoring, and detection of vulnerabilities like SQL injection (sqli), cross site request forgery (xssrf), among other things.

Key observations:

1. Documentation: The documentation seems to have inconsistencies in its content and organization which could lead to confusion. For example, some details are repeated without sufficient clarity.

2. Modular Design: There is no clear structure indicating whether it's separated into separate packages or modules for better maintainability / scalability / versioning purposes.

3. Variable Naming: Some variable names are overly specific ("message") while others lack clarity ("logSaveSize"). Consistency in naming can improve readability & understanding during code reviews.

4. Code Style/Pracise Documentation/Suggestions: It would help if there were more comments explaining functions, variables, rules etc. This makes the code easier to read and understand even within small snippets. Better quality source control also helps catch bugs early on during development cycles.

In addition, optimizing performance by reducing redundancy and simplifying where necessary would make the code lighter and faster while keeping the level of granularity useful enough to manage complex scenarios. Also, using modern practices like TypeScript or Javascript ESNext improvements can increase code longevity especially with respect to browser support.

Potential Issues Suggestion: Improving modular design might prevent duplication and future maintenance issues. Adding consistent use case descriptions and inline examples for each function or constant would greatly enhance usability and comprehension. Code cleanup, refactoring when needed would simplify and potentially remove redundancies.

Suggestions for Optimization:

• Simplify repetitive functionality or move to external libraries.
• Use type annotations where applicable to avoid errors at compile time.
• Consider employing testing frameworks that are appropriate for this context.
• Ensure correct and efficient handling of exceptions throughout all parts of application.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud