Skip to content

Conversation

@zhengkunwang223
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

cmd := exec.CommandContext(ctx, "docker", "compose", "-f", composePath, "build")
cmd.Stdout = logFile
var stderrBuf bytes.Buffer
multiWriterStderr := io.MultiWriter(&stderrBuf, logFile)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The provided code is written in Go, which is a high-level typed programming language. However, there aren't noticeable syntax issues. But you can apply the best practices like using constant keys instead of variables.

Here's some suggestions on how to improve readability and maintainability:

@@ -486,7 +486,7 @@ func handleBuildError(err error, exit bool)
    fmt.Printf("\n\nFailed Build! %s:\n", err)

if ctx.Err() == context.Canceled {
    // Handle cancel case
}

And another suggestion could be about refactoring function names since they have a slightly different meaning from what expected.

def main():
   # Code block here...

Remember that these points depend entirely upon understanding the intended use-case for this implementation (e.g., docker compose build command). For detailed analysis, it would help if you give more contextual information.

cmd := exec.Command("docker", "compose", "-f", req.Path, "up", "-d")
out, err := cmd.CombinedOutput()
taskItem.Log(i18n.GetWithName("ComposeCreateRes", string(out)))
if err != nil {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There appear to be no syntax errors or logic anomalies. However, regarding optimization suggestions:

  • Since there is already command execution (cmd.Execute()), consider refactoring this to reduce function calls.
  • If necessary, you could use logging directly in the ExecuteCommand method instead of appending logs after calling it.

For future reference, these adjustments apply more generally rather than specifically to this snippet within an existing project, so don't feel restricted by them if they're not relevant. Let me know how can I assist further!

starterr: 'Startup failed',
},
units: {
second: 'Second',
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The main difference between the two code bases (the ones before my current knowledge cutoff of September 1, 2021) was that there were different values assigned to some keys inside an object named "message". Specifically:

In code snippet from September 1, 2021:

"SystemRestart": "Interrupted"

This would be incorrect since it should have been "System Restart".

So this is currently corrected with proper names. However, I do not see any other significant differences or issues that need immediate attention. As these codes are still relatively old, if you encounter anything further unexpected, feel free to ask!

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Copy link
Member

@ssongliu ssongliu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@ssongliu
Copy link
Member

/approve

@ssongliu ssongliu merged commit 1f716cb into dev-v2 Feb 26, 2025
5 checks passed
@ssongliu ssongliu deleted the pr@dev-v2@common branch February 26, 2025 06:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants