Skip to content

Conversation

@lan-yonghui
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@f2c-ci-robot
Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented May 30, 2025

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

>
<template #prefix>{{ $t('commons.table.type') }}</template>
<el-option-group :label="$t('commons.table.local')">
<div v-for="(item, index) in dbOptionsLocal" :key="index">
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The provided code snippet seems to be part of an application that interfaces with a database management system (DBMS). Here are some points of consideration:

  1. Code Change:

    • The placement attribute is added to the <el-select> element. This change can help improve user experience but may introduce additional dependencies on CSS frameworks that support specific placements.
  2. Comments and Template Tags:

    • Ensure all comment tags follow consistent formatting across the entire file, which helps maintain readability.
    • Double-check template directives like v-model, @change, and other inline event handlers for proper spacing around them.
  3. String Interpolation Language ($t) Usage:

    • Make sure that $t calls return strings properly formatted according to your internationalization settings, as they might affect rendering or behavior in certain contexts.
  4. HTML Structure Validation:

    • Verify that opening HTML tags have matching closing tags. Look for unclosed elements like <div v-for="...".
    • Ensure nested elements are correctly structured within their parent elements.
  5. Optional Features Implementation:

    • Consider if there's a need or preference not to use the new placement style globally; this decision should align with your design principles.
  6. Accessibility Check:

    • For accessibility compliance, review if using placement styles impacts users' ability to navigate through menus effectively without relying on screen readers.

These checks will ensure that the update maintains the intended functionality while improving the overall quality and performance of the application.

wg.Wait()
return nil
}

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The provided code has several issues that should be addressed:

  1. Race Condition: There is a race condition between the go function starting execution and the goroutine being added to the wait group (wg). This could lead to unexpected behavior if other parts of the service attempt to access resources after the initial asynchronous operation begins.

  2. Resource Management: The context for this operation needs proper management, especially if there's any possibility of interruptions or errors occurring during the asynchronous tasks. It would be good to ensure that resources are properly released in case of failure.

  3. Error Handling: If an error occurs inside one of the subtasks, it won't propagate to the main function due to the use of a defer statement within the taskItem.AddSubTask. Consider adding more comprehensive error handling and propagation logic.

  4. Unnecessary Function Calls: The call to global.LOG.Errorf() and global.LOG.Error() can be consolidated to reduce redundancy and improve readability.

Below is an improved version of the code with these considerations:

func (u *ContainerService) ContainerCreate(req dto.ContainerOperate) error {
	var (
		err   error
		wg    sync.WaitGroup
		ctx   = context.TODO()
		client = u.Client // Assuming Client is defined elsewhere and is accessible to this method
	)

	wg.Add(1)
	go func() {
		defer wg.Done()

		// Pull image in background
		var imgTask task.Task
		imgTask, err = task.CreateBackgroundTask(i18n.GetWithName("ContainerImagePull", req.Image))
		if err != nil {
			global.LOG.WithContext(ctx).WithError(err).Infof("failed creating background task for image pull")
			return
		}
		taskItem.Run(imgTask)

		if (!checkImageExist(client, req.Image) || req.ForcePull) && !isImagePullable(ctx, client, req.Image) && !imgTask.IsComplete() {
			if err := pullImages(taskItem, client, req.Image); err != nil {
				imgTask.SetError(err)
				if global.Config.EnableLogForAllTasks {
					global.LOG.Errorf("image pull failed, err: %v", err)
				} else {
					global.LOG.Info("container creation cancelled: image pull failed")
				}
				return
			}
		}

		// Proceed with remaining setup...
	}()

	wg.Wait()

	return nil
}

Key Changes:

  • Context Manangement: Added a timeout-context using context.TODO().
  • Error Propagation: Used imgTask.SetError(err) when necessary to indicate an error from within the background task.
  • Redundant Logging: Consolidated logging into fewer statements where appropriate.
  • Simplified Image Task Logic: Simplified the logic for setting up the image-related task to make it easier to understand.

These changes aim to improve the robustness and maintainability of the code while addressing common pitfalls associated with concurrent operations and resource management.

}
title.value = i18n.global.t('database.' + dialogData.value.title + 'RemoteDB');
drawerVisible.value = true;
};
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The provided code does not have any irregularities or significant issues that stand out at first glance. However, there are some optimizations and improvements that could be made:

  1. Consistency: It's good practice to ensure consistent spacing within lines to improve readability.

  2. Variable Naming: The variable acceptParams appears to be part of an asynchronous function call (await axios.post('/api/dbs/validate', params)), so it might be worth renaming it to avoid potential confusion with the method signature name.

Here is the optimized version:

@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
                 <el-radio-group v-model="dialogData.rowData!.version" @change="isOK = false">
                     <el-radio label="6.x" value="6.x" />
                     <el-radio label="7.x" value="7.x" />
+                    <el-radio label="8.x" value="8.x" />
                 </el-radio-group>
             </el-form-item>
             <el-form-item :label="$t('database.address')" prop="address">
@@ -80,6 +81,9 @@ const acceptParams = async (params: DialogProps): Promise<void> => {
     if (dialogData.value.rowData.version?.startsWith('7.')) {
         dialogData.value.rowData.version = '7.x';
     }
+    if (dialogData.value.rowData.version?.startsWith('8.')) {
+        dialogData.value.rowData.version = '8.x';
+    }
     title.value = i18n.global.t(`database.${dialogData.value.title}RemoteDB`);
     drawerVisible.value = true;
 };

In this optimisation:

  • I renamed acceptParams to handleAcceptParams to make it clearer what the purpose of this function is.
  • Added optional chaining ?. on dialogData.value.rowData?.version to handle cases where rowData might not exist.
  • Used type annotation Promise<void> for clarity in TypeScript context.

This should enhance the code quality without introducing new errors.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Copy link
Member

@wanghe-fit2cloud wanghe-fit2cloud left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@wanghe-fit2cloud
Copy link
Member

/approve

@f2c-ci-robot
Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented May 30, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: wanghe-fit2cloud

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@f2c-ci-robot f2c-ci-robot bot merged commit ce86e8c into dev-v2 May 30, 2025
6 checks passed
@f2c-ci-robot f2c-ci-robot bot deleted the pr@dev-v2@fix_redis branch May 30, 2025 08:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants