fix: fix issue with clean runtime lop failed #8900
Conversation
|
Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
| container.value = props.container; | ||
| open.value = true; | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The provided code changes involve adding a new container prop to the ContainerLog component within the DrawerPro. This change could introduce some potential issues if not implemented correctly, particularly:
-
Initialization Issues: The new
containervariable is initialized but not used directly anywhere in the template. If you intend to pass it down to child components that expect or use it, ensure this initialization is correct and meaningful. -
Component Prop Handling: Ensure that both the parent (
drawer-pro) and its children (ContainerLog) handle thecontainerprop appropriately. This might include default values, validation checks, or additional logic when using it inside those components. -
Viewing Behavior: After making this change, make sure that the UI reflects how the
containerprop affects the rendering of containers. Check if there are any side effects like infinite loops or unexpected behavior with data binding.
To improve efficiency or readability:
- Consider renaming variables to better reflect their purpose.
- Review dependencies on other components or hooks to ensure they're necessary for the new functionality.
- Add type annotations where appropriate, especially for props and methods related to handling these changes.
Here's an example of a more comprehensive review based on typical best practices:
--- src/components/drawer/pro/index.vue
+++ src/components/drawer/pro/index.vue
@@ -12,7 +12,12 @@ <template>
</el-tooltip>
</template>
<template #content>
- <ContainerLog :compose="compose" :resource="resource" :highlightDiff="highlightDiff" />
+ <ContainerLog
+ v-if="!isEmpty(container)"
+ :compose="compose"
+ :resource="resource"
+ :container="container"
+ :highlightDiff="highlightDiff"
+ />
</template>
</DrawerPro>
<!-- Other parts of the file -->
@@ -26,9 +31,10 @@
import { ref } from 'vue';
// Define local state and reactive properties
const open = ref(false);
const resource = ref('');
+let selected_container = ''; // Using let here instead of ref ensures immutability initially
const globalStore = GlobalStore();
const logVisible = ref(false);
// Properties passed from outside the component
const compose = ref(''); // Assuming this is expected to be set externally
const highlightDiff = ref(320); // Default value
interface DialogProps {
compose: string;
resource: string;
}Note: Depending on broader application architecture, further adjustments may be needed regarding how state management handles updates to individual props or interactions between them.
| }); | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| const deleteServer = async (row: AI.McpServer) => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The provided code snippet contains a couple of minor issues and optimization opportunities, which mainly relate to parameter passing:
Issues Found:
-
Incomplete Parameter List: The
acceptParamsfunction is expecting three parameters (compose,resource, and an optionalcontainer). However, thedeleteServerfunction does not pass this last parameter (container) when callingcomposeLogRef.value.acceptParams. -
Slightly Less Concise Error Handling:
- Currently, if there's an error while opening or deleting the server, it could be handled more gracefully by either catching the exceptions in the functions directly or logging them without crashing.
-
Inconsistent Naming Conventions:
- There might be inconsistency with naming conventions within the components. Using different names like
openCreate,openLog, etc., might not follow a consistent pattern throughout the component hierarchy.
- There might be inconsistency with naming conventions within the components. Using different names like
Optimization Suggestions:
-
Improve Error Handling:
const deleteServer = async (row: AI.McpServer) => { try { await someAsyncOperation(row); // Replace with actual operation logic toast.success('Server deleted successfully'); } catch (error) { console.error('Error deleting server:', error); toast.error('Failed to delete server: ' + error.message); } };
-
Consistent Naming:
Ensure that all methods and their corresponding UI operations use consistently named classes, methods, and properties for clarity.
By addressing these points, you can improve the robustness, consistency, and user experience of your application.
| }); | ||
| } | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The changes do not introduce any irregularities or potential issues, but one minor optimization could be to extract the container property directly instead of accessing it via row.container. It seems that this value is always used only once and should be accessible without needing to pass an extra parameter to acceptParams.
Optimized code:
const openLog = (row: any) => {
const { path, name, container } = row; // Destructure properties
taskLogRef.value.openWithResourceID('App', 'TaskInstall', row.id);
switch (/* ... */ /* condition */) {
default:
composeLogRef.value.acceptParams({
compose: `${path}/docker-compose.yml`,
resource: name,
container,
});
}
};This change reduces unnecessary object dereferencing and makes the function slightly more efficient.
|
Refs #8883