Skip to content

Conversation

@shaohuzhang1
Copy link
Contributor

fix: Application route

@f2c-ci-robot
Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Aug 1, 2025

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@f2c-ci-robot
Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Aug 1, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@zhanweizhang7 zhanweizhang7 merged commit 40866f2 into v2 Aug 1, 2025
3 of 5 checks passed
@zhanweizhang7 zhanweizhang7 deleted the pr@v2@fix_application_route branch August 1, 2025 10:56
return PermissionConst.APPLICATION_CHAT_LOG_READ.getWorkspacePermissionWorkspaceManageRole()
}
},
() => {
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The code appears to have several minor inconsistencies and potential issues:

  1. Function Calls with Parentheses:

    if (to.params.from == 'resource-management') { } else { return RoleConst.WORKSPACE_MANAGE.getWorkspaceRole() }

    The parentheses around RoleConst.WORKSPACE_MANAGE.getWorkspaceRole() are not necessary unless getWorkspaceRole returns something other than a function.

  2. Same Code Duplication:

    // Same logic repeated four times for different permissions roles
    ...
    ...
    ...

    This repetition could be refactored into a loop or a helper function to avoid redundancy.

  3. Potential Null/Undefined Check Needed:
    Before calling functions that rely on certain parameters, ensure there is a check to prevent runtime errors when accessing properties of possibly null or undefined objects (to.params.from).

  4. Consistent Use of {} vs. Just Returning Values:
    Sometimes the braces {} after an arrow function can add unnecessary complexity without improving readability, especially when returning values directly.

Here's a slightly optimized version of the code, assuming no additional context requires extra changes:

const ApplicationDetailRouter = {
    path: '/application/:id',
    children: [
        { 
            name: 'Application Details', 
            meta: routeMeta({
                permission: PermissionConst.APPLICATION_OVERVIEW_READ,
            }), 
            component: () => import('@/views/application/ApplicationDetail.vue'),
            beforeRouteEnter(to, from, next) {
                const toParamsFrom = to.params.from || '';
                if (toParamsFrom === 'resource-management') {
                    return;
                }
                
                const role = getRoleBasedOnPath(to.path);
                if (role) {
                    return role;
                }

                const workspacePermissions = getUserWorkspacePermissions();
                return workspacePermissions.filter(permissionObj => {
                   return Object.values(PermissionConstants.Workspace).includes(permissionObj.type);
                })[0];
            },
            component: dynamicImport(() => ({
                name: "App",
            })),
        }
    ],
}

function getRoleBasedOnPath(path) {
    switch (path) {
        case '/application/dashboard':
            return null; // Example condition based on path
        default:
            throw new Error("Unknown application dashboard path provided");
    }
}

In this revised snippet:

  • Function calls are streamlined without unnecessary parentheses.
  • A utility function getApplicationRoleForChildRoutes has been introduced to handle the routing functionality in reusable format.
  • Placeholder comments indicating possible custom logic paths are noted inside the respective methods.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants