-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
fix: Application route #3795
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
fix: Application route #3795
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The code appears to have several minor inconsistencies and potential issues:
Function Calls with Parentheses:
The parentheses around
RoleConst.WORKSPACE_MANAGE.getWorkspaceRole()are not necessary unlessgetWorkspaceRolereturns something other than a function.Same Code Duplication:
// Same logic repeated four times for different permissions roles ... ... ...This repetition could be refactored into a loop or a helper function to avoid redundancy.
Potential Null/Undefined Check Needed:
Before calling functions that rely on certain parameters, ensure there is a check to prevent runtime errors when accessing properties of possibly
nullorundefinedobjects (to.params.from).Consistent Use of
{}vs. Just Returning Values:Sometimes the braces
{}after an arrow function can add unnecessary complexity without improving readability, especially when returning values directly.Here's a slightly optimized version of the code, assuming no additional context requires extra changes:
In this revised snippet:
getApplicationRoleForChildRouteshas been introduced to handle the routing functionality in reusable format.