style: Highly optimized when adding BREAK and Continue nodes #4102
Conversation
|
Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
| height: 100, | ||
| properties: { | ||
| width: 600, | ||
| stepName: t('views.applicationWorkflow.nodes.loopBreakNode.label'), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The code has an unnecessary change that reduces the height of both loopContinueNode and loopBreakNode. This might affect their visual representation on the workflow diagram. If you want to reduce the size of these nodes, consider adjusting their width or position instead.
Optimization suggestion:
If reducing the height is intended to improve performance or simplify rendering on mobile devices, ensure that this change does not negatively impact user interaction or understanding of the flowchart design. Consider alternative solutions for smaller node dimensions if necessary.
Note that changes made after September 1, 2021, should be re-evaluated against current best practices and standards for workflow development tools.
style: Highly optimized when adding BREAK and Continue nodes