fix: The restriction on simple application questioning is not effective #4107
Conversation
|
Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
| 'application_id': self.application_id, | ||
| 'mcp_enable': self.application.mcp_enable, | ||
| 'mcp_tool_ids': self.application.mcp_tool_ids, | ||
| 'mcp_servers': self.application.mcp_servers, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There are no immediate issues with the provided code snippet. It seems correct syntactically and logically. However, if "self.application_id" is a method that returns an ID but it's missing from the provided context (i.e., its implementation), there might be an error when calling this method.
As far as optimizations go:
- Ensure that all variables referenced have been defined before they are used to avoid NameError.
- If you're using Python 3, consider changing
raw_input()toinput(), which reads input strings from the user.
In summary, there are no major flaws but ensure your dependencies work properly.
fix: The restriction on simple application questioning is not effective