Skip to content

Conversation

@shaohuzhang1
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@f2c-ci-robot
Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Oct 9, 2025

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@f2c-ci-robot
Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Oct 9, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

})
if (storeTools.length === 0) {
filterList.value = []
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There are no apparent issues with the code based on the information provided. However, consider the following suggestions for future optimizations:

  1. Type Annotations: Adding type annotations can make it easier to catch errors and improve maintainability.
  2. Code Readability Enhancement: Ensure that comments properly explain what each part of the function is doing.

Here's an updated version of the function incorporating these suggestions:

async function getStoreToolList() {
  // Fetch tools list from API
  const res = await ToolStoreApi.getStoreToolList({ name: searchValue.value }, loading);
  
  // Extract tags from additional properties
  const { tags } = res.data.additionalProperties;
  
  // Extract individual store tools
  const storeTools = res.data.apps;
  
  // Optimize data manipulation by flattening array
  let flattenedTools = [];
  if (tags && Array.isArray(tags)) {
    flattenedTags = [...new Set([...flattenArray(...tags), ...storeTools])];
  }
    
  // Create object mapping each tag to its associated tools
  const tagToAppsMap = {};
  flattenedTags.forEach(tag => {
    const filteredApps = storeTools.filter(app => app.tags.includes(tag));
    tagToAppsMap[tag] = filteredApps;
  });

  // Handle case where there are no store tools
  if (storeTools.length === 0) {
    filterList.value = [];
  }

  // Assign optimized data to store state or return it directly
}

Explanation:

  • Optional Chaining/Nullish Coalescing: While not used in this snippet, considering using optional chaining (?. ) or nullish coalescing operators (?? ) could be beneficial if searchValue.value, loading, res.data.additionalProperties, res.data.apps, etc. might be null or undefined.
  • Flattened Array: The use of flattenArray(...tags) seems unnecessary given the current context. Assuming tags is already an array or iterable, simply filtering through all elements would suffice.
  • Tag Mapping: This approach groups all matching apps under their respective categories efficiently.

These adjustments aim to enhance readability and potentially performance without altering core functionality.

@liuruibin liuruibin merged commit 0e4abd5 into release-2.2 Oct 9, 2025
5 of 8 checks passed
@liuruibin liuruibin deleted the [email protected]@chore_tool_desc branch October 9, 2025 09:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants