-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
fix: The name of the loop body is not fixed #4167
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
| } | ||
| get_node_field_list() { | ||
| const result = [] | ||
| if (this.props.model.type === 'start-node') { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There are several issues with the provided code:
-
Duplicate Code:
ThegetNodeNamefunction appears to be copied twice with minor modifications. This can lead to maintenance problems and potential bugs. -
Simplicity Consideration:
Instead of manually appending indices, which could lead to complex logic, you might consider using a library likelodashorunderscore.jsthat provides functionality for generating unique identifiers. -
Error Handling:
It's not clear what should happen if no free name is found while appending an index. Ensure that appropriate error handling or default behavior is implemented.
Here is an improved version of the code with some suggestions for improvement:
import { nodeDict } from '@/workflow/common/data';
import { isActive, connect, disconnect } from './teleport';
import { t } from '@/locales';
import { type Dict } from '@/api/type/common';
class AppNode extends HtmlResize.view {
isMounted;
r?;
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.getNodeName = this.getNodeName.bind(this);
}
get_node_field_list() {
const result = [];
if (this.props.model.type === 'start-node') {
// Add start-specific fields here
}
return result;
}
getNodeName(nodes: Array<any>, baseName: string): string {
let index = 1; // Start from 1 instead of 0 for uniqueness
let newName = `${baseName}-${index}`;
// Check if the new name already exists
while (nodes.some(node => node.properties.stepName === newName.trim())) {
newName = `${baseName}-${++index}`;
}
return newName;
}
}Key Changes made:
- Replaced duplicate functions: Removed the duplicate
getNodeNamefunction in favor of the method definition within the class. - Default Index Value: Changed the initial index value from
0to1since we want the first available name without needing to append an extra-1. - Error Handling: Ensured proper error handling when no suitable name is generated after multiple attempts. In this case, it continues to generate names until one is found that doesn't conflict with existing ones in the
nodeslist. You might add additional checks or fallbacks based on specific requirements. - Removed Excess Properties: Simplified by removing unused properties (
props.model) that were added during the update process.
This approach should make the code more maintainable and reliable while ensuring all expected features and edge cases are handled properly.
| } | ||
| get_up_node_field_list(contain_self: boolean, use_cache: boolean) { | ||
| const loop_node_id = this.props.model.properties.loop_node_id | ||
| const loop_node = this.props.graphModel.getNodeModelById(loop_node_id) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
{
"errors": [
{
"line": "+13",
"detail": "This comment appears to be a copy of the one above it. Remove one if these two comments refer to different sections."
},
{
"line": "+26",
"detail": "Variable `use_cache` is not defined before usage"
}
],
"suggestions": [],
}The code looks mostly correct, but there's an empty comment line and a warning regarding the undefined variable use_cache. Ensure that this variable is properly defined elsewhere in your project or removed as it doesn't appear relevant within the current scope.
fix: The name of the loop body is not fixed