-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
fix: The name of the loop body is not fixed #4167
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -1,10 +1,13 @@ | ||
| import { WorkflowMode } from './../../../enums/application' | ||
| import LoopNode from './index.vue' | ||
| import { t } from '@/locales' | ||
| import { AppNode, AppNodeModel } from '@/workflow/common/app-node' | ||
| class LoopBodyNodeView extends AppNode { | ||
| constructor(props: any) { | ||
| super(props, LoopNode) | ||
| } | ||
| getNodeName() { | ||
| return t('views.applicationWorkflow.nodes.loopBodyNode.label') | ||
| } | ||
| get_up_node_field_list(contain_self: boolean, use_cache: boolean) { | ||
| const loop_node_id = this.props.model.properties.loop_node_id | ||
| const loop_node = this.props.graphModel.getNodeModelById(loop_node_id) | ||
|
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. {
"errors": [
{
"line": "+13",
"detail": "This comment appears to be a copy of the one above it. Remove one if these two comments refer to different sections."
},
{
"line": "+26",
"detail": "Variable `use_cache` is not defined before usage"
}
],
"suggestions": [],
}The code looks mostly correct, but there's an empty comment line and a warning regarding the undefined variable |
||
|
|
||
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There are several issues with the provided code:
Duplicate Code:
The
getNodeNamefunction appears to be copied twice with minor modifications. This can lead to maintenance problems and potential bugs.Simplicity Consideration:
Instead of manually appending indices, which could lead to complex logic, you might consider using a library like
lodashorunderscore.jsthat provides functionality for generating unique identifiers.Error Handling:
It's not clear what should happen if no free name is found while appending an index. Ensure that appropriate error handling or default behavior is implemented.
Here is an improved version of the code with some suggestions for improvement:
Key Changes made:
getNodeNamefunction in favor of the method definition within the class.0to1since we want the first available name without needing to append an extra-1.nodeslist. You might add additional checks or fallbacks based on specific requirements.props.model) that were added during the update process.This approach should make the code more maintainable and reliable while ensuring all expected features and edge cases are handled properly.