Skip to content

Conversation

@shaohuzhang1
Copy link
Contributor

fix: Typos error

@f2c-ci-robot
Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Oct 14, 2025

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@f2c-ci-robot
Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Oct 14, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

if (isFolder) {
return permissionOptions
}
if (hasPermission([EditionConst.IS_EE, EditionConst.IS_PE], 'OR')) {
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The provided code looks generally correct for handling different permission options based on whether an entity is a folder, root folder, or does not have specific permissions. However, there are some minor issues that could be addressed:

  1. Misnaming: Variable naming consistency is important for readability and maintainability. Using isFolder instead of both isFodler would make the function signature more uniform.

  2. Comments: While comments can help clarify the logic, they should be concise and relevant to the code. In this case, the comment could be refined.

Here's the revised version with these suggestions:

const permissionOptions = [
]

const getPermissionOptions = (isFolder = false, isRootFolder = false) => {
  if (isFolder && isRootFolder) {
    return permissionOptions.filter(item => item.value === AuthorizationEnum.VIEW || item.value === AuthorizationEnum.MANAGE)
  }
  if (isFolder) {
    return permissionOptions
  }
  if (hasPermission([EditionConst.IS_EE, EditionConst.IS_PE], 'OR')) { 
    // Additional checks here
  }
}

These changes ensure better coding practices, making it easier to understand the purpose and usage of the function.

@zhanweizhang7 zhanweizhang7 merged commit 80c790b into v2 Oct 14, 2025
4 of 6 checks passed
@zhanweizhang7 zhanweizhang7 deleted the pr@v2@fix_typos_error branch October 14, 2025 08:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants