Skip to content

Conversation

@shaohuzhang1
Copy link
Contributor

fix: Workflow knowledge base import button error

@f2c-ci-robot
Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Dec 3, 2025

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@f2c-ci-robot
Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Dec 3, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

})
} else {
MsgError(t('views.application.tip.noDocPermission'))
}
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No significant irregularities were found in the provided code. However, here are some optimization suggestions:

  1. Variable Naming: Consider using more descriptive variable names to improve readability and maintainability.

  2. Code Duplication: The else block can be simplified by moving the error message into a single function call:

if (permissionPrecise.value.doc_create(id)) {
  ActionRef.value.validate().then(() => {
    form_data.value[active.value] = ActionRef.value.get_data();
    loadSharedApi({ type: 'knowledge', systemType: apiType.value })
      .workflowAction(id, form_data.value, loading)
      .then((ok: any) => {
        action_id.value = ok.data.id;
        active.value = 'result';
      });
  });
} else {
  MsgError(t('views.application.tip.noDocPermission'));
}

To optimize further within performance constraints and reduce unnecessary computations, ensure that the API requests are efficient and do not introduce delays where non-critical tasks could wait:

  1. Throttle/Debounce: If you expect multiple calls with similar parameters during rapid user actions, consider throttling or debouncing certain parts of the logic to prevent redundant operations.

These optimizations aim to enhance both usability and efficiency while keeping the code clean and readable.

v-if="base_form_list.length > 0 ? active == 'knowledge_base' : active == 'data_source'"
@click="upload"
type="primary"
:disabled="loading"
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The provided code has two small issues that need addressing:

  1. Logical Error: The condition active == 'knowledge_base' is followed by true, which does not make sense logically. It should be removed since v-if expressions evaluate to either true or false.

  2. Code Duplication: Using $t('views.document.buttons.next') twice with different attributes (type and :disabled) can be optimized. You can extract this static string into a variable if it's the same across these instances.

Here is the modified version of the code:

@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@
         {{ $t('views.document.buttons.next') }}
       </el-button>
       <el-button
-        v-if="base_form_list.length > 0 && active == 'knowledge_base'"
+        v-if="base_form_list.length > 0 && active == 'data_source'"
         @click="upload"
         type="primary"
         :disabled="loading"

Additionally, you might consider storing this translation key in a single place for better readability and maintainability. For example:

const next_button_label = $t('views.document.buttons.next');

This would give you more flexibility to change labels without affecting multiple locations in your codebase.

@shaohuzhang1 shaohuzhang1 merged commit 9539082 into v2 Dec 3, 2025
4 of 5 checks passed
@shaohuzhang1 shaohuzhang1 deleted the pr@v2@fix_workflow_knowledge branch December 3, 2025 09:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants