Skip to content

fix: text to speech doc show request body#2036

Merged
liuruibin merged 1 commit intomainfrom
pr@main@fix_text_to_speech
Jan 20, 2025
Merged

fix: text to speech doc show request body#2036
liuruibin merged 1 commit intomainfrom
pr@main@fix_text_to_speech

Conversation

@shaohuzhang1
Copy link
Contributor

fix: text to speech doc show request body 【【github#2032 】【swagger 文档】/api/application/application_id/text to_speech 接口缺少文件上传的入口参数】 https://www.tapd.cn/57709429/bugtrace/bugs/view/1157709429001051530

【【github#2032 】【swagger 文档】/api/application/application_id/text to_speech 接口缺少文件上传的入口参数】
https://www.tapd.cn/57709429/bugtrace/bugs/view/1157709429001051530
@f2c-ci-robot
Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Jan 20, 2025

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@f2c-ci-robot
Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Jan 20, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In your updated code for the get_request_params_api() function within TextToSpeech, there are a few minor adjustments and clarifications that can be made:

  1. Remove @staticmethod Decorator: Since you have defined both static methods (get_request_params_api() and get_request_body_api()) for the TextToSpeech class, it's redundant to use both decorators on all these methods. You only need one decorator per method.

  2. Correct Parameter Names: In the get_request_params_api() function, the parameter names should not include underscores (e.g., 'text_to_speech'). Use hyphens instead if needed.

Here is the revised version of your code:

@@ -401,7 +401,7 @@ def get_request_params_api():
                                           description=_('Application ID'))
                 ]
         ],
-
+        (
             'application-id',
             openapi.IN_PATH,
             openapi.TYPE_STRING,
             True,
             _('Application ID')

These changes ensure that the Python syntax is correct without unnecessary repetition. Let me know if you need further modifications!

tags=[_('Application')])
@has_permissions(
ViewPermission([RoleConstants.ADMIN, RoleConstants.USER, RoleConstants.APPLICATION_ACCESS_TOKEN],
[lambda r, keywords: Permission(group=Group.APPLICATION,
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The code snippet appears to be defining an API view endpoint specifically for text-to-speech functionality. Here's a brief analysis:

Potential Issues:

  1. Duplicated Code: The get_request_params_api and get_request_body_api methods seem to return the same result based on their parameters. This means there might be redundant logic if these functions' behavior depends only on input parameters.

  2. Action Summary and ID Documentation: Although you've set up Swagger documentation using swagger_auto_schema, the summaries and IDs (operation_summary and operation_id) are not fully utilized. Consider adding more descriptive content here if needed.

  3. Permissions Handling: The permission handling is specified with a lambda function that evaluates whether a user is part of the 'APPLICATION' group or has one of the roles. Ensure that this logic aligns with your application's security requirements.

  4. Tags Documentation: The docstring provides tags under which the API method will be categorized. However, it’s important to ensure these tags match those used elsewhere in your API documentation to maintain consistency.

  5. Response Object: While responses=result.get_default_response() seems correct, depending on how result.default_response is defined, it may need further validation to ensure it returns the expected type and structure.

  6. Class Methods: There isn't any specific issue with the class methods themselves but ensuring they adhere to best practices (e.g., appropriate use of static/instance methods) would be good to consider.

  7. API Naming Conventions: Ensure that the API endpoints follow proper naming conventions and are consistent across similar endpoints.

Overall, the code looks structured correctly based on its purpose and intent. If you have additional requirements or constraints, adjusting these parts accordingly might be beneficial.

@liuruibin liuruibin merged commit 0e7f466 into main Jan 20, 2025
4 of 5 checks passed
@liuruibin liuruibin deleted the pr@main@fix_text_to_speech branch January 20, 2025 02:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants