fix: Knowledge base retrieval segmentation sorted by relevance#2791
fix: Knowledge base retrieval segmentation sorted by relevance#2791shaohuzhang1 merged 1 commit intomainfrom
Conversation
|
Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
| result])[0:dataset_setting.get('max_paragraph_char_number', 5000)], | ||
| 'directly_return': '\n'.join( | ||
| [paragraph.get('content') for paragraph in | ||
| result if |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There are two minor issues in the given code:
-
At line 86, there is an extra closing parenthesis
}after'is_hit_handling_method'which seems unintended. -
In line 94, you have another unexpected closing parenthesis
{at the end of the list comprehension for extracting paragraphs.
To fix these, modify lines 86 and 94 as follows:
'directly_return': ''.join(
[paragraph.get('content') for paragraph in result if
paragraph.get('hit_status', 'False') == 'True']),These changes ensure that both conditions are tested before appending to the final string, and they also corrects syntax errors due to unnecessary parentheses. This should improve readability and possibly function correctly depending on how result is structured. However, please review the rest of your code to ensure it addresses all functionality requirements without introducing additional bugs or inefficiencies.
1 participant
fix: Knowledge base retrieval segmentation sorted by relevance