-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
fix: In the floating window embedding, the user in the conversation is displayed as a tourist #4019 #4075
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
fix: In the floating window embedding, the user in the conversation is displayed as a tourist #4019 #4075
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The provided code has a few potential issues and can be optimized:
Potential Issues:
Variable Scope: The
is_askervariable is declared inside theif application.work_flow is not None:block but is used outside of it when checking'asker', which might lead to unexpected behavior.Logic for API Input Variable: The logic to determine if each input field should include an API request (
'api_input') relies solely on the value assigned at runtime, which could cause issues if values change dynamically after initialization.Redundant Code: There is redundant handling for
"asker"in both the inner loop and the outer condition when determining whether to append it to the query parameters.String Formatting: Use Python's formatted string literals (f-strings) instead of concatenation with
+, which improves readability and performance.Optimization Suggestions:
Initialize
is_askerOutside Block: Initializeis_askerbefore entering the critical section where its usage depends on external conditions.Avoid Redundant Checks: Combine checks for
'asker'into one statement using logical OR (or). This eliminates redundancy in appending"asker"to the query string.Here is the revised version of the method:
Explanation of Changes:
Initialization: Added
is_asker = Falseline above any conditional blocks where it will be used.Dynamic Value Handling: Combined the check for
'asker'into a single condition within theforloop to avoid redundant operations.F-string Usage: Replaced manual concatenation with f-string formatting for improved clarity and efficiency. Also ensured that non-existent key retrieval uses
.get()with a default value of an empty string, preventing exceptions.