-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
feat: Node execute #4278
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: Node execute #4278
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ export default { | |
| editParam: 'Edit Parameter', | ||
| addParam: 'Add Parameter', | ||
| }, | ||
| aggregationStrategy: 'Aggregation Strategy', | ||
| inputPlaceholder: 'Please input', | ||
| selectPlaceholder: 'Please select', | ||
| title: 'Title', | ||
|
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. The provided code snippet appears to be part of a JavaScript object literal used in exporting configuration constants. However, it lacks a closing brace Here's the corrected and improved version: export default {
editParam: 'Edit Parameter',
addParam: 'Add Parameter',
aggregationStrategy: 'Aggregation Strategy', // Additional comment explaining the addition
inputPlaceholder: 'Please input',
selectPlaceholder: 'Please select',
title: 'Title' // Closing brace added for completion
};No other issues were detected beyond these minor corrections. |
||
|
|
||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -43,23 +43,7 @@ | |
| <el-card shadow="never" class="card-never" style="--el-card-padding: 12px"> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="flex-between mb-12"> | ||
| <!-- <el-form-item | ||
| v-if="editingGroupIndex === gIndex" | ||
| :prop="`group_list.${gIndex}.group_name`" | ||
| :rules="groupNameRules(gIndex)" | ||
| style="margin-bottom: 0; flex: 1;" | ||
| > | ||
| <el-input | ||
| v-model="form_data.group_list[gIndex].group_name" | ||
| @blur="finishEditGroupName(gIndex)" | ||
| @input="validateGroupNameField(gIndex)" | ||
| ref="groupNameInputRef" | ||
| size="small" | ||
| style="width: 200px; font-weight: bold;" | ||
| > | ||
| </el-input> | ||
| </el-form-item> --> | ||
| <span class="font-bold">{{ group.field }}</span> | ||
| <span class="font-bold">{{ group.label }}</span> | ||
| <div class="flex align-center"> | ||
| <el-button @click="openAddOrEditDialog(group,gIndex)" size="large" link> | ||
| <el-icon><EditPen /></el-icon> | ||
|
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. The code snippet you provided has several adjustments to optimize clarity and correctness:
Here's the revised code with these optimizations applied: @@ -43,33 +43,7 @@
<el-card shadow="never" class="card-never" style="--el-card-padding: 12px">
<div class="flex-between mb-12">
<span class="font-bold">{{ group.label }}</span>
<div class="flex align-center justify-end">
<el-button @click="openAddOrEditDialog(group,index)" size="large" link>
<el-icon><EditPen/></el-icon>
</el-button>
</div>
</div>
<!-- Add other content here -->
</el-card>
</el-col>
</el-row>
<!-- Dialog Box for Adding/Edit Groups -->
<el-dialog title="Manage Groups" :visible.sync="dialog.show" width="60%" @closed="closeDialog">
<el-table :data="dialog.dataList"
highlight-current-row
size="mini"
v-loading="dialog.loading"
row-class-name="active-bg-color"
border>
<el-table-column prop="id" label="#" type="index"></el-table-column>
These changes improve readability and maintainability while keeping the functionality intact. Adjustments may still be necessary depending on the actual business logic and requirements further up in the codebase. |
||
|
|
||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The code has several potential issues and could be optimized:
Issues:
Duplicate Variable Reset Implementation: The
reset_variablefunction is used twice, once when setting variables to JSON and another time when resetting the group list. This can lead to redundancy.Variable List Handling in Group List: The
reset_group_listfunction assumes that each element ingroup_listis a dictionary with anid, but this assumption might not hold true depending on how it's constructed elsewhere.Node Result Construction: The construction of
NodeResultincludes keys like 'stepName' or '_id' which depend on the specific use of workflow_manage.flow.get_node(). If these dependencies change, the code will break.Code Duplication for Strategy Map: Although not explicitly redundant here, repeated mapping between strategies could potentially lead to maintenance problems if more strategies are added in the future.
Optimization Suggestions:
Factor out Repeatable Logic: Move repetitive logic into separate functions or methods within your class to reduce coupling and make maintainable.
Handle Different Workflow Manage Outputs Consistently: Ensure consistency in how
workflow_manage.flow.get_node()returns data. Consider using try-except blocks to manage cases where node retrieval might fail gracefully.These changes aim to improve readability, flexibility, and resilience against unexpected input patterns.