Skip to content

Conversation

sunu
Copy link
Contributor

@sunu sunu commented Jul 1, 2025

We tested spinning up multiple pods for the SSIM workshop. It always created a node per pod because the CPU availability was insufficient.

I'm decreasing the CPU request here a bit to test if that helps put 2 user pods in a single node for the workshop.

Changing the option for the non-workshop environment too just to help us test without being part of the workshop group.

refs #6308

We tested spinning up multiple pods for the SSIM workshop. It always created a node per pod because the CPU availability was insufficient.

I'm decreasing the CPU request here a bit to test if that helps put 2 user pods in a single node for the workshop.

Changing the option for the non-workshop environment too just to help us test without being part of the workshop group.
@sunu sunu requested review from GeorgianaElena and yuvipanda July 1, 2025 10:44
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 1, 2025

Merging this PR will trigger the following deployment actions.

Support deployments

No support upgrades will be triggered

Staging deployments

Cloud Provider Cluster Name Hub Name Reason for Redeploy
aws nasa-ghg staging Following helm chart values files were modified: common.values.yaml

Production deployments

Cloud Provider Cluster Name Hub Name Reason for Redeploy
aws nasa-ghg prod Following helm chart values files were modified: common.values.yaml

@batpad
Copy link
Contributor

batpad commented Jul 2, 2025

cc @aprilmj we may need a bit of a timely look at this to get this in before the workshop starts next Tuesday. Currently, only one instance is being placed per node and wasting a lot of capacity - this should ideally fix that and fit two instances per node.

yuvipanda added a commit to yuvipanda/pilot-hubs that referenced this pull request Jul 2, 2025
In 2i2c-org#6309, we discovered that
some of our resource allocations were now outdated. This adds a 2% wiggle room
that should help with that
@yuvipanda
Copy link
Member

#6313 is the right fix but we can deploy this as is for now

@yuvipanda yuvipanda merged commit a150c33 into main Jul 2, 2025
11 checks passed
@yuvipanda yuvipanda deleted the ghg-ssim-workshop-resource-allocation branch July 2, 2025 20:39
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 2, 2025

🎉🎉🎉🎉

Monitor the deployment of the hubs here 👉 https://github.com/2i2c-org/infrastructure/actions/runs/16035338108

yuvipanda added a commit to yuvipanda/pilot-hubs that referenced this pull request Jul 15, 2025
In 2i2c-org#6309, we discovered that
some of our resource allocations were now outdated. This adds a 2% wiggle room
that should help with that
jnywong pushed a commit to jnywong/infrastructure that referenced this pull request Aug 7, 2025
In 2i2c-org#6309, we discovered that
some of our resource allocations were now outdated. This adds a 2% wiggle room
that should help with that
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants