Conversation
2ede689 to
0b52dd6
Compare
6015cd1 to
37cc828
Compare
4b185d1 to
63d8e93
Compare
2ad8b98 to
e1b5bd6
Compare
864ed92 to
7691bbb
Compare
02db13f to
3341b1b
Compare
xenoy
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We need to discus, the commants to see what needs to be changed and what could be done at a future point.
What i would generally discus is the implementation of choice values. I think they don't need to be handled that differently. The main difference to other values is they already exist and are the only valid options. If the identifier (value) of the custom value in combination with the field is made unique and you handle every value as if it would be a choice value. This way you don't need the hack to map the id as you can use value and field as identifier. This would also reduce the amount of entries as if two instance had the same value, regardless if it is a choice field, fhey would point to the same value.
3341b1b to
10cad71
Compare
10cad71 to
615bd9d
Compare
Description
Belongs to PBI TI-2893.
Checklist
The following checklist should help us to stick to our "definition of done":