-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
2026.01.000 #176
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
2026.01.000 #176
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Anton Steketee <79179784+anton-seaice@users.noreply.github.com>
|
The model version in the |
|
🚀 Attempted to deploy 🖥️
|
|
🚀 Attempted to deploy 🖥️
|
Updating openmpi as suggested by @anton-seaice ACCESS-NRI/access-om3-configs#1028 (comment) / @helenmacdonald
|
🚀 Attempted to deploy 🖥️
|
ACCESS-NRI/ACCESS-OM3#176 (comment) Testing `openmpi` version '@5.0.8'
|
Should be faster now @chrisb13, it's found the already built esmf :
It re-uses '`covllzb' for builds in this PR (note that hash only exists in this PR) - to do this in a different PR use the hash from an esmf build in that PR. |
|
🚀 Attempted to deploy 🖥️
|
@chrisb13 and @helenmacdonald updating `ACCESS-NRI/GFDL-generic-tracers` as determined [here](ACCESS-NRI/access-om3-configs#1028 (comment))
Test to see if GitHub will run two deployments at once?
|
🚀 Attempted to deploy 🖥️
|
|
🚀 Attempted to deploy 🖥️
|
Needed to update acccess-spack-packages to a newer version to accommodate generic-tracers `2025.09.000` (this build failed https://github.com/ACCESS-NRI/ACCESS-OM3/actions/runs/20904149711/job/60054678559)
Thanks @anton-seaice, I think it's now faster, about ~30 minutes (even with just your change). Is that expected? |
Sounds plausible - depends how far down the dependency chain the change is. e.g. if the only change is to access3 (which has no dependents) then its fast, if the change is to openmpi then its very slow (which has many dependents) |
|
Ok but with your recent change, which only changed the source for esmf isn't it effectively no change? As in, everything is already built so is it taking 30 minutes to basically determine that nothing is needed? |
|
🚀 Attempted to deploy 🖥️
|
|
🚀 Attempted to deploy 🖥️
|
|
🚀 Attempted to deploy 🖥️
|
Rolling back mom6 version for the time being whilst we check that the latest `access3-share` works (`rc-2026.01.000`). This uses the forks version of CMEPS, CDEPS and CESM_share as well as the updated patches/files from here: ACCESS-NRI/access3-share#22 (comment) Also related: ACCESS-NRI/access3-share#19
|
🚀 Attempted to deploy 🖥️
|
Looking to test the theory that the `access3-share` update broke historical repro, see: ACCESS-NRI/access-om3-configs#1033 (comment)
|
🚀 Attempted to deploy 🖥️
|
Changing version of `access3-share` incrementally across the components. This is just testing the change of CMEPS to using our fork. See: - ACCESS-NRI/access3-share@342685c - ACCESS-NRI/access3-share#19
Changing version of `access3-share` incrementally across the components. This is just testing the change of CMEPS _and_ CESM_share (with access changes applied). See: - #176 - ACCESS-NRI/access3-share@3b44248 - ACCESS-NRI/access3-share@342685c
|
🚀 Attempted to deploy 🖥️
|
|
🚀 Attempted to deploy 🖥️
|
Based on this comment: ACCESS-NRI/access3-share#22 (comment) Anton has done a force push of the branch `rc-2026.01.000`, and comments (see above link) that each commit builds. Seeing if it also builds in om3 (could attempt a repro test if applicable). This commit tests: "Update the CESM_share 1.1.18" [dcbe86b](ACCESS-NRI/access3-share@dcbe86b)
Based on this comment: ACCESS-NRI/access3-share#22 (comment) Anton has done a force push of the branch `rc-2026.01.000`, and comments (see above link) that each commit builds. Seeing if it also builds in om3 (could attempt a repro test if applicable). This commit tests: "Update to CDEPS 1.0.86" [4daf043](ACCESS-NRI/access3-share@4daf043)
Based on this comment: ACCESS-NRI/access3-share#22 (comment) Anton has done a force push of the branch `rc-2026.01.000`, and comments (see above link) that each commit builds. Seeing if it also builds in om3 (could attempt a repro test if applicable). This commit tests: "Update to CMEPS 1.1.31" [ed7680e](ACCESS-NRI/access3-share@ed7680e)
|
🚀 Attempted to deploy 🖥️
|
|
🚀 Attempted to deploy 🖥️
|
Testing: ACCESS-NRI/ACCESS-OM3#176 (comment) i.e. "Update the CESM_share 1.1.18" [dcbe86b](ACCESS-NRI/access3-share@dcbe86b)
|
🚀 Attempted to deploy 🖥️
|
Testing: ACCESS-NRI/ACCESS-OM3#176 (comment) i.e. "Update to CDEPS 1.0.86" [4daf043](ACCESS-NRI/access3-share@4daf043)
Testing: ACCESS-NRI/ACCESS-OM3#176 (comment) i.e. "Update to CMEPS 1.1.31" [ed7680e](ACCESS-NRI/access3-share@ed7680e) (we expect this to fail, it'll be weird if it doesn't!)
New release with updates to all upstream components - as noted in ACCESS-NRI/access-om3-configs#1028 (comment)
🚀 The latest prerelease
access-om3/pr176-17at fb73b7c is here: #176 (comment) 🚀