@@ -9,6 +9,216 @@ and this project adheres to [Semantic Versioning](https://semver.org/spec/v2.0.0
99
1010---
1111
12+ ## [ 0.9.2] - 2025-11-18
13+
14+ ### 🎯 Toolkit Type Detection & Simplified Generator Pattern
15+
16+ ** Proposal ID** : PROP-2025-11-18-TOOLKIT-TYPE-DETECTION
17+ ** Date** : 2025-11-18
18+ ** Status** : ✅ Implemented
19+ ** Severity** : HIGH (Architecture-level)
20+ ** Source** : Continued Generator pattern misinterpretation analysis
21+ ** Related** : v0.9.1 (complete solution)
22+
23+ #### 🚨 Critical Insight
24+
25+ ** MetaSpec only generates Specification Toolkits, not Domain Applications.**
26+
27+ The previous v0.9.1 fix added guidance but did not remove the conceptual confusion introduced by "Domain Application" examples in ` specify.md.j2 ` . This led to continued misunderstandings about Generator's purpose.
28+
29+ ** Key realization** :
30+ ```
31+ MetaSpec Architecture:
32+ Layer 1: MetaSpec → Generates Specification Toolkits
33+ Layer 2: Specification Toolkit → Manages specifications (parse, validate, init)
34+ Layer 3: Domain Application → Consumes specs, generates domain content (OUTSIDE MetaSpec scope)
35+ ```
36+
37+ ** Domain Applications** (content generators, doc builders, SDK generators) are ** NOT generated by MetaSpec** - they are separate applications built by users that consume specifications.
38+
39+ #### 🔧 Implemented Fixes
40+
41+ ** Fix 1: Simplified Step 4.5 - Removed "Domain Application" Concept** (` specify.md.j2 ` )
42+
43+ ** Before** (v0.9.1):
44+ ``` markdown
45+ ### Step 4.5: Determine Toolkit Type (CRITICAL for Generator)
46+
47+ Decision Tree:
48+ Question 1: MANAGE specifications? → SPECIFICATION TOOLKIT
49+ Question 2: CONSUME specifications? → DOMAIN APPLICATION
50+
51+ Classification Examples:
52+ - marketing-spec-kit → SPECIFICATION TOOLKIT
53+ - api-doc-generator → DOMAIN APPLICATION ❌
54+
55+ Choose template based on classification:
56+ - Option A: For Specification Toolkits
57+ - Option B: For Domain Applications
58+ ```
59+
60+ ** After** (v0.9.2):
61+ ``` markdown
62+ ### Step 4.5: Understand Generator's Purpose in Spec Toolkits
63+
64+ CRITICAL: All toolkits generated by MetaSpec are Specification Toolkits.
65+
66+ Generator should create:
67+ ✅ Project structure (dirs, constitution, README)
68+ ✅ Specification templates (.yaml/.json)
69+ ❌ NOT domain content (posts, docs, code)
70+
71+ Real Example: marketing-spec-kit
72+ ✅ Generate: Project structure, spec templates
73+ ❌ Do NOT generate: Marketing posts, blog articles
74+ (Those belong in separate "marketing-content-generator" app)
75+ ```
76+
77+ ** Changes** :
78+ - Removed "Domain Application" decision tree (Question 2)
79+ - Removed "Domain Application Indicators" table
80+ - Removed "api-doc-generator" example (not a spec toolkit)
81+ - Removed classification logic (no longer needed)
82+ - Clarified "content generation" means project files, not domain deliverables
83+ - Deleted 190 lines of confusing content
84+ - Replaced with 62 lines of focused guidance
85+
86+ ** Fix 2: Unified Generator Template - Removed Option B** (` specify.md.j2 ` )
87+
88+ ** Before** (v0.9.1):
89+ ``` markdown
90+ ### Step 5: Define Generator Component (if CORE)
91+
92+ ⚠️ CRITICAL: Choose the correct template based on your toolkit type
93+
94+ #### Option A: For Specification Toolkits
95+ (Project file generation template)
96+
97+ #### Option B: For Domain Applications
98+ (Domain content generation template)
99+ ```
100+
101+ ** After** (v0.9.2):
102+ ``` markdown
103+ ### Step 5: Define Generator Component (if CORE)
104+
105+ Use this template for your Specification Toolkit
106+
107+ (Single unified template for project file generation)
108+ ```
109+
110+ ** Changes** :
111+ - Removed Option A/B distinction
112+ - Removed entire "Option B: For Domain Applications" section (115 lines)
113+ - Simplified to single template
114+ - All generated toolkits now have consistent Generator architecture
115+
116+ ** Fix 3: Added Post-Generation Verification Checklist** (` specify.md.j2 ` )
117+
118+ ** New Section** : Step 5d - Post-Generation Verification
119+
120+ ``` markdown
121+ #### Step 5d: Post-Generation Verification ⭐ NEW
122+
123+ Verify Generator aligns with MetaSpec standards:
124+
125+ ✅ Generator Purpose Checklist:
126+ - What does Generator create? Project files ✅ / Domain content ❌
127+ - init command argument? <project-directory> ✅ / <spec-file> ❌
128+ - init command output? Full project structure ✅ / Single file ❌
129+
130+ 📋 Specific Validation Rules:
131+ Rule 1: Generator Purpose (correct examples / wrong examples)
132+ Rule 2: Generation Targets (project files / domain content)
133+ Rule 3: init Command Pattern (directory arg / file arg)
134+ Rule 4: CLI Integration (init creates project / generate creates content)
135+
136+ 🎯 Decision Matrix:
137+ Does Generator create project directories? YES ✅ / NO ⚠️
138+ Does Generator create domain content? NO ✅ / YES ❌
139+
140+ 🚨 Red Flags:
141+ - Generation Targets include: "posts", "articles", "emails"
142+ - CLI example shows: `generate post`, `create content`
143+ - Templates include: `post.j2`, `article.j2`
144+
145+ ✅ Verification Actions:
146+ 1-5. Review checklist items
147+ 6. Run `/metaspec.sdd.analyze` for automated validation
148+ ```
149+
150+ ** Changes** :
151+ - Added 122 lines of comprehensive verification guidance
152+ - Provides concrete red flags to catch mistakes immediately
153+ - Links to automated validation via ` /metaspec.sdd.analyze `
154+
155+ #### 📊 Implementation Results
156+
157+ ** File Changes** :
158+ - ` src/metaspec/templates/meta/sdd/commands/specify.md.j2 `
159+ - Lines: 3587 → 3461 (-126 lines net)
160+ - Deleted Domain Application content: ~ 250 lines
161+ - Added verification checklist: +122 lines
162+ - Simplified architecture guidance
163+
164+ ** Architecture Impact** :
165+ - ✅ Eliminates conceptual confusion about MetaSpec's scope
166+ - ✅ Single clear pattern: All toolkits are Specification Toolkits
167+ - ✅ Generator always creates project files, never domain content
168+ - ✅ Provides verification checklist to catch mistakes early
169+ - ✅ Links to automated validation via ` /metaspec.sdd.analyze `
170+
171+ ** Quality Improvements** :
172+ - Specification generation clarity: 📈 Significantly improved
173+ - Generator purpose clarity: 📈 Significantly improved
174+ - Early mistake detection: 📈 New capability (Step 5d checklist)
175+ - Architecture consistency: 📈 Perfect alignment with MetaSpec's own implementation
176+
177+ #### 🧪 Test Coverage
178+
179+ ** Not applicable** : These are guidance improvements in template content, not runtime code changes.
180+
181+ ** Validation approach** :
182+ - Review generated ` spec.md ` files from ` /metaspec.sdd.specify `
183+ - Verify Generator definitions follow project file pattern
184+ - Confirm no domain content generation examples
185+ - Run ` /metaspec.sdd.analyze ` to catch violations
186+
187+ #### 🚀 Migration Path
188+
189+ ** For existing toolkit specs** :
190+
191+ 1 . ** Review Generator definition** in your ` specs/toolkit/001-*/spec.md `
192+ 2 . ** Check Generator Purpose** against Step 5d checklist
193+ 3 . ** If Generator creates domain content** : This is architectural misalignment
194+ - Option A: Redefine Generator to create project files only
195+ - Option B: Remove Generator, move domain generation to separate app
196+ 4 . ** Run ` /metaspec.sdd.analyze ` ** to validate compliance
197+
198+ ** For new toolkit development** :
199+ - Follow updated ` /metaspec.sdd.specify ` guidance automatically
200+ - Use Step 5d checklist before finalizing spec
201+ - Run ` /metaspec.sdd.analyze ` for validation
202+
203+ #### 📝 Notes
204+
205+ ** Why this matters** :
206+
207+ The confusion between "Specification Toolkits" and "Domain Applications" is not just semantic - it represents a fundamental misunderstanding of MetaSpec's architecture:
208+
209+ - ** MetaSpec generates toolkits** that manage specifications
210+ - ** Domain Applications** consume specifications to generate deliverables
211+ - These are ** two different layers** in the architecture
212+
213+ By removing "Domain Application" from ` specify.md.j2 ` , we eliminate the false choice and guide users toward the correct pattern: ** All MetaSpec-generated toolkits are Specification Toolkits** .
214+
215+ ** Related documentation** :
216+ - See ` AGENTS.md ` Step 3.5 for init command standards
217+ - See v0.9.0 for init command standard definition
218+ - See v0.9.1 for Generator Pattern guidance
219+
220+ ---
221+
12222## [ 0.9.1] - 2025-11-18
13223
14224### 🎯 Generator Pattern Clarification (Supplement to v0.9.0)
0 commit comments